Skip to main content

Interactive Knowledge Acquisition and Scenario Authoring

  • Conference paper
PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5351))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1332 Accesses

Abstract

Encoding knowledge and authoring content in virtual reality systems typically requires trained specialists. This project, concerned with training people to identify risky situations, aims to reduce the knowledge acquisition bottleneck by allowing trainers to enter their knowledge and generate alternative scenarios whilst interacting with existing training sessions. The goal is not only to speed up the capture of knowledge and content but also to tap into (tacit) knowledge through this knowledge-in-action approach and to allow the trainee to experience and query the underlying domain knowledge. Ripple Down Rules is proposed as the knowledge representation and method as it supports incremental acquisition of rules performed by the domain expert as new situations arise. In this project we seek to capture concurrently new knowledge and cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brisson, A., Dias, J., Paiva, A.: From Chinese shadows to interactive shadows: building a storytelling application with autonomous shadows. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent-Based Systems for Human Learning and Entertainment (ABSHLE), AAMAS 2007. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C., Poggi, I.: Lying as pretending to give information. In: Parret, H. (ed.) Pretending to communicate, de Gruyte, Berlin, New York, pp. 276–291 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compton, P., Jansen, R.: A Philosophical Basis for Knowledge Acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 2, 241–257 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Compton, P., Peters, L., Edwards, G., Lavers, T.G.: Experience with Ripple-Down Rules. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(5), 356–362 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129, 74–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman, P.: Telling Lies — Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage, 3rd edn. Norton and Co. Ltd., New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, B.H.: Validating Knowledge Acquisition: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules, PhD dissertation, Computer Science, University of New South Wales (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, B., Yoshida, K., Motoda, H., Compton, P.: A help desk system with intelligence interface. Applied Artificial Intelligence 11, 611–631 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I.: Subtleties of facial expressions in embodied agents. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 31, 301–312 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: Social Role Awareness in Animated Agents. In: Proceedings of Agents 2001, Montreal, Canada, pp. 270–277 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quinlan, J.R.: Discovering rules by induction from large collections of examples. In: Mitchie, D.E. (ed.) Expert systems in the micro-electronic age. Edinburgh Uni. Press, Edinburgh (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rehm, M., André, E.: Catch me if you can: exploring lying agents in social settings. In: Proceedings of the Fourth international Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2005, The Netherlands, pp. 937–944. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J.C., Boland, M., Graco, W., He, H.: Classifying general practitioner practice profiles. In: Compton, P., Mizoguchi, R., Motoda, H., Menzies, T. (eds.) PKAW 1996: Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Coogee, Sydney, Australia, pp. 333–345 (October 1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richards, D. (2008). Interactive Knowledge Acquisition and Scenario Authoring. In: Ho, TB., Zhou, ZH. (eds) PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_104

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_104

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89196-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89197-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics