Skip to main content

Toward Formalizing Common-Sense Psychology: An Analysis of the False-Belief Task

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5351))

Abstract

Predicting and explaining the behavior of others in terms of mental states is indispensable for everyday life. It will be equally important for artificial agents. We present an inference system for representing and reasoning about certain types of mental states, and use it to provide a formal analysis of the false-belief task. The system allows for the representation of information about events, causation, and perceptual, doxastic, and epistemic states (vision, belief, and knowledge), incorporating ideas from the event calculus and multi-agent epistemic logic. Unlike previous AI formalisms, our focus here is on mechanized proofs and proof programmability, not on metamathematical results. Reasoning is performed via cognitively plausible inference rules, and automation is achieved by general-purpose inference methods. The system has been implemented as an interactive theorem prover and is available for experimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C.A.: The Paradox of the Knower. Journal of Philosophy 80(6), 338–355 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Arkoudas, K.: Athena, http://www.pac.csail.mit.edu/athena

  3. Arkoudas, K., Bringsjord, S.: Metareasoning for multi-agent epistemic logics. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bello, P., Bignoli, P., Cassimatis, N.: Attention and Association Explain the Emergence of Reasoning about False Beliefs in Young Children. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, pp. 169–174 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies, M., Stone, T. (eds.): Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dennett, D.: Conditions of personhood. In: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, pp. 267–285. Bradford Books, Montgomery (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engelmore, R., Morgan, T. (eds.): Blackboard Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning about knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodman, N.D., Bonawitz, E.B., Baker, C.L., Mansinghka, V.K., Gopnik, A., Wellman, H., Schulz, L., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Intuitive theories of mind: A rational approach to false belief. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R 1991), pp. 473–484 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shapiro, S., Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.J.: The cognitive agents specification language and verification environment for multiagent systems. In: The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002, pp. 19–26 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sturm, H., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Common Knowledge and Quantification. Economic Theory 19, 157–186 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Watt, S.N.K.: Seeing things as people. PhD thesis, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wimmer, H., Perner, J.: Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–128 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolter, F.: First Order Common Knowledge Logics. Studia Logica 65, 249–271 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wooldridge, M.: Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arkoudas, K., Bringsjord, S. (2008). Toward Formalizing Common-Sense Psychology: An Analysis of the False-Belief Task. In: Ho, TB., Zhou, ZH. (eds) PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89196-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89197-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics