Abstract
In support vector learning, computational complexity of testing phase scales linearly with number of support vectors (SVs) included in the solution – support vector machine (SVM). Among different approaches, reduced set methods speed-up the testing phase by replacing original SVM with a simplified one that consists of smaller number of SVs, called reduced vectors (RV). In this paper we introduce an extension of the bottom-up method for binary-class SVMs to multi-class SVMs. The extension includes: calculations for optimally combining two multi-weighted SVs, selection heuristic for choosing a good pair of SVs for replacing them with a newly created vector, and algorithm for reducing the number of SVs included in a SVM classifier. We show that our method possesses key advantages over others in terms of applicability, efficiency and stability. In constructing RVs, it requires finding a single maximum point of a one-variable function. Experimental results on public datasets show that simplified SVMs can run faster original SVMs up to 100 times with almost no change in predictive accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. COLT 1992, pp. 144–152. ACM, New York (1992)
Burges, C.J.C.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2(2), 955–974 (1998)
Burges, C.J.C.: Simplified support vector decision rules. In: Proc. 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, San Mateo, CA, pp. 71–77 (1996)
Tang, B., Mazzoni, D.: Multiclass reduced-set support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 25-29, 2006, vol. 148, pp. 921–928. ACM, New York (2006)
Nguyen, D., Ho, T.: An efficient method for simplifying support vector machines. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2005, Bonn, Germany, August 07-11, 2005, vol. 119, pp. 617–624. ACM, New York (2005)
Schölkopf, B., Mika, S., Burges, C.J.C., Knirsch, P., Müller, K.-R., Rätsch, G., Smola, A.: Input Space vs. Feature Space in Kernel-Based Methods. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10, 1000–1017 (1999)
Fan, R.-E., Chen, P.-H., Lin, C.-J.: Working set selection using second order information for training SVM. Journal of Machine Learning Research 6, 1889–1918 (2005), http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical recipes in C++: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvmtools/datasets/multiclass.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nguyen, D., Matsumoto, K., Hashimoto, K., Takishima, Y., Takatori, D., Terabe, M. (2008). Multi-class Support Vector Machine Simplification. In: Ho, TB., Zhou, ZH. (eds) PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89197-0_74
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89196-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89197-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)