Abstract
The Use Case Point method (UCP method) allows early, easy estimation of the anticipated effort during a software development project. The basis for such estimation in real industrial projects is commonly a number of rough specifications in different formats and of differing granularity. The success of the UCP method and comparability of the results depend above all on whether and how good use cases can be identified and weighted from the specifications. Within a field study, a total number of more than 200 UCP estimations based on eight different specification formats have been performed. The estimations have been compared quantitatively and qualitatively with regard to the reproducibility of effort estimation and with regard to expert valuations. With the help of statistical methods a mean variance (variation coefficient) between 13 % and 48 % was found depending on the specification format. Thus, a valuation of specification formats for improving estimation accuracy could be derived with the help of variance analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Frohnhoff, S., Jung, V., Engels, G.: Use Case Points in der industriellen Praxis. In: Abran, A., et al. (eds.) Applied Software Measurement - Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Metrics and DASMA Software Metrik Kongress, pp. 511–526. Shaker Verlag (2006)
Habela, P., et al.: Adapting Use Case Model for COSMIC-FFP Based Measurement. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Software Measurement, Montreal, Canada. Shaker Verlag (2005)
Ouwerkerk, J., Abran, A.: An Evaluation of the Design of Use Case Points (UCP). In: Mensura 2006 (International on Software Processand Product Measurement), Cadiz, Spain (2006)
Cockburn, A.: Structuring Use Cases with Goals (January 15, 2007), http://alistair.cockburn.us/crystal/articles/sucwg/structuringucswithgoals.htm
Frohnhoff, S., Kehler, K., Dumke, R.: Leitfaden zum Finden von Anwendungsfällen für die Use Case Points Methode, Preprint, Fakultät für Informatik, Universität Magdeburg (2007)
Engeroff, T.: Analyse der Use-Case-Points-Methode hinsichtlich der zugrunde liegenden Spezifikationsformate, Diplomarbeit, Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Technische Universität Darmstadt (April 2008)
Karner, K.: Metrics for Objectory. Diploma thesis, University of Linköping, Sweden, No. LiTHIDA-Ex-9344 (1993)
Frohnhoff, S., Engels, G.: Revised Use Case Point Method - Effort Estimation in Development Projects for Business Applications. In: Proceedings of the CONQUEST 2008 - 11th International Conference on Quality Engineering in Software Technology, Potsdam. dpunkt verlag (2008)
Siedersleben, J.: Moderne Software-Architektur. dpunkt verlag (2004)
Prechelt, L.: Kontrollierte Experimente in der Softwaretechnik: Potenzial und Methode. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Sachs, L., Hedderich, J.: Angewandte Statistik – Methodensammlung mit R. Springer, Kiel, 12. Auflage (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Frohnhoff, S., Engeroff, T. (2008). Field Study: Influence of Different Specification Formats on the Use Case Point Method. In: Dumke, R.R., Braungarten, R., Büren, G., Abran, A., Cuadrado-Gallego, J.J. (eds) Software Process and Product Measurement. Mensura MetriKon IWSM 2008 2008 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89403-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89403-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89402-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89403-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)