Abstract
Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) [1] and the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA2) [2] are the two most widely used evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms. Although, they have been quite successful so far in solving a wide variety of real life optimization problems mostly 2 or 3 objective in nature, their performance is known to deteriorate significantly with an increasing number of objectives. The term many objective optimization refers to problems with number of objectives significantly larger than two or three. In this paper, we provide an overview of the challenges involved in solving many objective optimization problems and provide an in depth study on the performance of recently proposed substitute distance based approaches, viz. Subvector dominance, -eps-dominance, Fuzzy Pareto Dominance and Sub-objective dominance count for NSGA-II to deal with many objective optimization problems. The present study has been conducted on scalable benchmark functions (DTLZ2-DTLZ3) and the recently proposed P* problem [3] since their convergence and diversity measures can be compared conveniently. An alternative substitute distance approach is introduced in this paper and compared with existing ones on the set of benchmark problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zurich, Switzerland (2002)
Koppen, M., Yoshida, K.: Substitute distance assignments in NSGA-II for handling many-objective optimization problems. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 727–741. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization. In: 3rd International Workshop on Genetic and Evolving Systems (GEFS 2008), pp. 47–52 (March 2008)
Khare, V., Yao, X., Deb, K.: Performance Scaling of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 376–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Corne, D.W., Knowles, J.D.: Techniques for highly multiobjective optimisation: some nondominated points are better than others. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO 2007), pp. 773–780. ACM, New York (2007)
Sato, H., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Controlling dominance area of solutions and its impact on the performance of moeas. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 5–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Ishibuchi, H., Murata, T.: A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 28(3), 392–403 (1998)
Ishibuchi, H., Yoshida, T., Murata, T.: Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 204–223 (2003)
Jaszkiewicz, A.: Genetic local search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 127(1), 50–71 (2002)
Zitzler, E., Kunzli, S.: Indicator-Based Selection in Multiobjective Search. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 832–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Deb, K., Sundar, J.: Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO 2006), pp. 635–642. ACM, New York (2006)
Fleming, P., Purshouse, R., Lygoe, R.: Many-Objective Optimization: An Engineering Design Perspective. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 14–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Thiele, L., Miettinen, K., Korhonen, P., Molina, J.: A preference-based interactive evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Technical Report W-412, Helsinki School of Economics (2007)
Obayashi, S., Sasaki, D.: Visualization and data mining of pareto solutions using self-organizing map. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 796–809. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Pryke, A., Sanaz Mostaghim, A.N.: Heatmap visualization of population based multi objective algorithms. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 361–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Koppen, M., Yoshida, K.: Many-objective particle swarm optimization by gradual leader selection. In: Beliczynski, B., Dzielinski, A., Iwanowski, M., Ribeiro, B. (eds.) ICANNGA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4431, pp. 323–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Saxena, D.K., Deb, K.: Trading on infeasibility by exploiting constraints criticality through multi-objectivization: A system design perspective. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2007), September 25-28, 2007, pp. 919–926 (2007)
Koppen, M., Vincente-Garcia, R., Nickolay, B.: Fuzzy-pareto-dominance and its application in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 399–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Wagner, T., Beume, N., Naujoks, B.: Pareto-, aggregation-, and indicator-based methods in many-objective optimization. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 742–756. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), vol. 1, pp. 825–830 (May 2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, H.K., Isaacs, A., Ray, T., Smith, W. (2008). A Study on the Performance of Substitute Distance Based Approaches for Evolutionary Many Objective Optimization. In: Li, X., et al. Simulated Evolution and Learning. SEAL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89694-4_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89694-4_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89693-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89694-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)