Skip to main content

On the Integration of Singleton Consistencies and Look-Ahead Heuristics

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5129))

Abstract

The efficiency of complete solvers depends both on constraint propagation to narrow the domains and some form of complete search. Whereas constraint propagators should achieve a good trade-off between their complexity and the pruning that is obtained, search heuristics take decisions based on information about the state of the problem being solved. In general, these two components are independent and are indeed considered separately. A recent family of algorithms have been proposed to achieve a strong form of consistency called Singleton Consistency (SC). These algorithms perform a limited amount of search and propagation (lookahead) to remove inconsistent values from the variables domains, making SC costly to maintain. This paper follows from the observation that search states being explored while enforcing SC are an important source of information about the future search space which is being ignored. In this paper we discuss the integration of this look-ahead information into variable and value selection heuristics, and show that significant speedups are obtained in a number of standard benchmark problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barták, R., Erben, R.: A new algorithm for singleton arc consistency. In: Barr, V., Markov, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2004), Miami Beach, Florida, USA. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bessiére, C., Régin, J.-C.: Arc consistency for general constraint networks: preliminary results. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1997, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 398–404 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bessière, C., Debruyne, R.: Theoretical analysis of singleton arc consistency. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bessière, C., Debruyne, R.: Optimal and suboptimal singleton arc consistency algorithms. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheeseman, P., Kanefsky, B., Taylor, W.M.: Where the really hard problems are. In: Proceeding of IJCAI 1991, pp. 331–340 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Culberson, J.: Graph coloring resources. on-line, http://web.cs.ualberta.ca/joe/Coloring/Generators/generate.html

  7. Debruyne, R., Bessière, C.: Some practicable filtering techniques for the constraint satisfaction problem. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1997, pp. 412–417 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. del Val, D., Cebrian: Redundant modeling for the quasigroup completion problem. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) CP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2833, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geelen, P.A.: Dual viewpoint heuristics for binary constraint satisfaction problems. In: Proceedings of ECAI 1992, pp. 31–35. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gent, I.P., MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., Walsh, T.: The constrainedness of search. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1996, vol. 1, pp. 246–252 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gent, I.P., MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., Smith, B.M., Walsh, T.: Random constraint satisfaction: Flaws and structure. Constraints 6(4), 345–372 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Haralick, R.M., Elliott, G.L.: Increasing tree search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence 14, 263–313 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kask, K., Dechter, R., Gogate, V.: New look-ahead schemes for constraint satisfaction. In: Proceeding of AMAI 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kautz, Ruan, Achlioptas, Gomes, Selman, Stickel.: Balance and filtering in structured satisfiable problems. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lecoutre, C., Cardon, S.: A greedy approach to establish singleton arc consistency. In: Kaelbling, L.P., Saffiotti, A. (eds.) Proceedings of IJCAI 2005, pp. 199–204. Professional Book Center (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mackworth, A.K., Freuder, E.C.: The complexity of some polynomial network consistency algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence 25, 65–74 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prosser, P., Stergiou, K., Walsh, T.: Singleton consistencies. In: Dechter, R. (ed.) CP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1894, pp. 353–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Refalo, P.: Impact-based search strategies for constraint programming. In: Wallace, M. (ed.) CP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3258, pp. 557–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw, P., Stergiou, K., Walsh, T.: Arc consistency and quasigroup completion. In: Proceedings of ECAI 1998 workshop on non-binary constraints, March 14 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Correia, M., Barahona, P. (2008). On the Integration of Singleton Consistencies and Look-Ahead Heuristics. In: Fages, F., Rossi, F., Soliman, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Constraints. CSCLP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89812-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89812-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89811-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89812-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics