Skip to main content

Ternary Subset Difference Method and Its Quantitative Analysis

  • Conference paper
Information Security Applications (WISA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5379))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes a ternary subset difference method (SD method) that is resistant to coalition attacks. In order to realize a secure ternary SD method, we design a new cover-finding algorithm, label assignment algorithm, and encryption algorithm. These algorithms are required to revoke one or two subtrees simultaneously while maintaining resistance against coalition attacks. We realize this two-way revocation mechanism by creatively using labels and hashed labels. Then, we evaluate the efficiency and security of the ternary SD method. We show that the upper bound of the average message length in the ternary SD method is smaller by about 12.2 percent than that of the conventional SD method, and the number of labels on each client device can be reduced by about 20.4 percent. On the other hand, the computational cost imposed on a client device stays within O(logn). Finally, we prove that the ternary SD method is secure against coalition attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Naor, D., Naor, M., Lotspiech, J.: Revocation and Tracing Schemes for Stateless Receivers. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 41–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkovits, S.: How to Broadcast a Secret. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 535–541. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiat, A., Naor, M.: Broadcast Encryption. In: Stinson, D.R. (ed.) CRYPTO 1993. LNCS, vol. 773, pp. 480–491. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Halevy, D., Shamir, A.: The LSD Broadcast Encryption Scheme. In: Yung, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2442, pp. 47–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodrich, M.T., Sun, J.Z., Tamassia, R.: Efficient Tree-Based Revocation in Groups of Low-State Devices. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 511–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jho, N.S., Hwang, J.Y., Cheon, J.H., Kim, M.H., Lee, D.H., Yoo, E.S.: One-Way Chain Based Broadcast Encryption Schemes. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 559–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang, J.Y., Lee, D.H., Lim, J.: Generic Transformation for Scalable Broadcast Encryption Schemes. In: Shoup, V. (ed.) CRYPTO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3621, pp. 276–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Attrapadung, N., Imai, H.: Practical Broadcast Encryption from Graph-Theoretic Techniques and Subset-Incremental-Chain Structure. IEICE Transaction on Fundamentalof Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, Special Section on Cryptography and Information Security E90-A(1), 187–203 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Asano, T.: A Revocation Scheme with Minimal Storage at Receivers. In: Zheng, Y. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2501, pp. 433–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Attrapadung, N., Kobara, K., Imai, H.: Sequential Key Derivation Patterns for Broadcast Encryption and Key Predistribution Schemes. In: Laih, C.-S. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2894, pp. 374–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentry, C., Ramzan, Z.: RSA Accumulator Based Broadcast Encryption. In: Zhang, K., Zheng, Y. (eds.) ISC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3225, pp. 73–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Boneh, D., Gentry, C., Waters, B.: Collusion Resistant Broadcast Encryption With Short Ciphertexts and Private Keys. In: Shoup, V. (ed.) CRYPTO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3621, pp. 258–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fukushima, K., Kiyomoto, S., Tanaka, T., Sakurai, K. (2009). Ternary Subset Difference Method and Its Quantitative Analysis. In: Chung, KI., Sohn, K., Yung, M. (eds) Information Security Applications. WISA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00306-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00306-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00305-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00306-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics