Skip to main content

Rasterizing Census Geography: Definition and Optimization of a Regular Grid

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in GIScience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

  • 1508 Accesses

Abstract

The results of first and second order analyses tend to be affected by the characteristics of the spatial units at which data are sampled. This paper discusses the definition of a regular grid superimposed on a set of given irregular census units, and the subsequent redistribution of the census variables to the newly defined grid cells. A statistical criterion guides the definition and optimization of the grid: through an objective function, the method aims at preserving the global spatial autocorrelation measured for a salient variable on the original census units. Several aspects of the grid positioning and population redistribution are critically discussed. Ultimately, the proposed method constitutes a valuable alternative to the spatial heterogeneity that affects many empirical spatial data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amrhein, C.G. (1995). Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: Evidence from statistical simulations. Environment & Planning A, 27(1):105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amrhein, C.G., and H. Reynolds (1996). Using spatial statistics to assess aggregation effects. Geographical Systems, 3:143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amrhein, C.G., and H. Reynolds (1997). Using the Getis statistic to explore aggregation effects in Metropolitan Toronto census data. The Canadian Geographer, 41(2):137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1994). Exploratory spatial data analysis and Geographic Information Systems. In M. Painho, ed., New Tools for Spatial Analysis, pp. 45–54. Luxembourg: EuroStat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertazzon, S., and S. Olson (2008) Alternative Distance Metrics for Enhanced Reliability of Spatial Regression Analysis of Health Data. Gervasi et al. (Eds.): Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5072, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications, Part I, pp. 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G.P. (1977). Human and Environmental Systems: A Geographer’s Appraisal. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A.D., and J.K. Ord (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, J. (2002). ArcScript “Data Partitioner”. ESRI Script Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A.S., and D.W.S. Wong (1991). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23:1025–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilova, M., S. Bertazzon, A. Hoang, and H. Mathur (2005). Dynamic grid-based approach for analysis of multi-dimensional data. In Proceedings of the 4th ISPRS Workshop on Dynamic and Multidimensional GIS (DMGIS’05). GMVAG 2005, London, UK, ISPRS Press, Vol. XXXVI, Part 2, W29, pp. 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlke, C., and K. Biehl (1934). Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. Journal of American Statistical Association, 29:169–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. (2008). A history of the concept of spatial autocorrelation: A geographer’s perspective. Geographical Analysis, 40(3):297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D.A. (1984). Reexamining the question “Are locations unique?” Progress in Human Geography, 8:82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R. (1990). Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfield, A. (1997). Crime pattern analysis, spatial targeting and GIS: Evaluating the Safer Merseyside Partnership Initiative. International Seminar on the Mapping and Analysis of Geo-referenced Crime Data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski, D.E., and J. Wu (1996). The modifiable area unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11(3):129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascov, O. (2005). ArcScript “Grid Maker”. ESRI Scripts Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakaya, T. (2000). An information statistical approach to the modifiable areal unit problem in incidence rate maps. Environment & Planning A, 32(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odland, J. (1988). Spatial Autocorrelation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S., and P.J. Taylor P.J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley, ed., Statistical Methods in Spatial Sciences, pp. 127– 144. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, A. (1984). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, CATMOG 38. GeoAbstracts, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S., and S. Alvanides (1999). Zone design for planning and policy analysis. In J. Stillwell, S. Geertman, and S. Openshaw, eds., Geographical Information and Planning, pp. 299–315. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1977). A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region building, partitioning, and spatial modeling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2 (new series):459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., and J. Wu (1996). Effects of changing resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11(1):39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H., and C.G. Amrhein (1998). Some effects of spatial aggregation on multivariate regression parameters. In D. Griffith, C. Amrhein, and J.-M. Huriot, eds., Econometric Advances in Spatial Modelling and Methodology: Essays in Honour of Jean Paelinck. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D.W.S., H.A. Lasus, and R.F. Falk (1999). Exploring the variability of segregation index D with scale and zonal systems: An analysis of thirty U.S. cities. Environment and Planning A, 31:507–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G., and M. Kendall (1950). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New York: Charles Griffin and Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himanshu Mathur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mathur, H., Bertazzon, S. (2009). Rasterizing Census Geography: Definition and Optimization of a Regular Grid. In: Sester, M., Bernard, L., Paelke, V. (eds) Advances in GIScience. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00318-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics