Abstract
The results of first and second order analyses tend to be affected by the characteristics of the spatial units at which data are sampled. This paper discusses the definition of a regular grid superimposed on a set of given irregular census units, and the subsequent redistribution of the census variables to the newly defined grid cells. A statistical criterion guides the definition and optimization of the grid: through an objective function, the method aims at preserving the global spatial autocorrelation measured for a salient variable on the original census units. Several aspects of the grid positioning and population redistribution are critically discussed. Ultimately, the proposed method constitutes a valuable alternative to the spatial heterogeneity that affects many empirical spatial data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amrhein, C.G. (1995). Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: Evidence from statistical simulations. Environment & Planning A, 27(1):105.
Amrhein, C.G., and H. Reynolds (1996). Using spatial statistics to assess aggregation effects. Geographical Systems, 3:143–158.
Amrhein, C.G., and H. Reynolds (1997). Using the Getis statistic to explore aggregation effects in Metropolitan Toronto census data. The Canadian Geographer, 41(2):137–149.
Anselin, L. (1994). Exploratory spatial data analysis and Geographic Information Systems. In M. Painho, ed., New Tools for Spatial Analysis, pp. 45–54. Luxembourg: EuroStat.
Bertazzon, S., and S. Olson (2008) Alternative Distance Metrics for Enhanced Reliability of Spatial Regression Analysis of Health Data. Gervasi et al. (Eds.): Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5072, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications, Part I, pp. 361–374.
Chapman, G.P. (1977). Human and Environmental Systems: A Geographer’s Appraisal. New York: Academic Press.
Cliff, A.D., and J.K. Ord (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion Ltd.
Dou, J. (2002). ArcScript “Data Partitioner”. ESRI Script Library.
Fotheringham, A.S., and D.W.S. Wong (1991). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23:1025–1045.
Gavrilova, M., S. Bertazzon, A. Hoang, and H. Mathur (2005). Dynamic grid-based approach for analysis of multi-dimensional data. In Proceedings of the 4th ISPRS Workshop on Dynamic and Multidimensional GIS (DMGIS’05). GMVAG 2005, London, UK, ISPRS Press, Vol. XXXVI, Part 2, W29, pp. 28–36.
Gehlke, C., and K. Biehl (1934). Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. Journal of American Statistical Association, 29:169–170.
Getis, A. (2008). A history of the concept of spatial autocorrelation: A geographer’s perspective. Geographical Analysis, 40(3):297–309.
Griffith, D.A. (1984). Reexamining the question “Are locations unique?” Progress in Human Geography, 8:82–95.
Haining, R. (1990). Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences.
Hirschfield, A. (1997). Crime pattern analysis, spatial targeting and GIS: Evaluating the Safer Merseyside Partnership Initiative. International Seminar on the Mapping and Analysis of Geo-referenced Crime Data.
Jelinski, D.E., and J. Wu (1996). The modifiable area unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11(3):129–140.
Lascov, O. (2005). ArcScript “Grid Maker”. ESRI Scripts Library.
Nakaya, T. (2000). An information statistical approach to the modifiable areal unit problem in incidence rate maps. Environment & Planning A, 32(1).
Odland, J. (1988). Spatial Autocorrelation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Openshaw, S., and P.J. Taylor P.J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley, ed., Statistical Methods in Spatial Sciences, pp. 127– 144. London: Pion.
Openshaw, A. (1984). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, CATMOG 38. GeoAbstracts, Norwich.
Openshaw, S., and S. Alvanides (1999). Zone design for planning and policy analysis. In J. Stillwell, S. Geertman, and S. Openshaw, eds., Geographical Information and Planning, pp. 299–315. Berlin: Springer.
Openshaw, S. (1977). A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region building, partitioning, and spatial modeling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2 (new series):459–472.
Qi, Y., and J. Wu (1996). Effects of changing resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11(1):39–49.
Reynolds, H., and C.G. Amrhein (1998). Some effects of spatial aggregation on multivariate regression parameters. In D. Griffith, C. Amrhein, and J.-M. Huriot, eds., Econometric Advances in Spatial Modelling and Methodology: Essays in Honour of Jean Paelinck. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wong, D.W.S., H.A. Lasus, and R.F. Falk (1999). Exploring the variability of segregation index D with scale and zonal systems: An analysis of thirty U.S. cities. Environment and Planning A, 31:507–522.
Yule, G., and M. Kendall (1950). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New York: Charles Griffin and Co., Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mathur, H., Bertazzon, S. (2009). Rasterizing Census Geography: Definition and Optimization of a Regular Grid. In: Sester, M., Bernard, L., Paelke, V. (eds) Advances in GIScience. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00318-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00318-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00317-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00318-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)