Skip to main content

Petri Nets as a Formalism for Comparing Expressiveness of Workflow-Based Clinical Guideline Languages

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 17))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There has been relatively little work on formal analysis of expressiveness and verification of properties in clinical workflow. In this paper we discuss Coloured Petri nets (CPNs) as a formalism to support such analysis. We show in detail how a typical clinical guideline language (PROforma) may be formally mapped to a CPN representation, then show how such a mapping allows formal proofs that a guideline language is capable or is not capable of expressing a standardised workflow pattern. We argue that the strategies of proof presented here to study the expressiveness of PROforma can be generalized to an arbitrary workflow-based language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., Petruni, K.: Keeping Workflow Models as Simple as Possible. In: Proceeding of the workshop on CSCW, Petri Nets and related formalism, pp. 11–29 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, B., Avrunin, G.S., Henneman, E.A., Clarke, L.A., Osterweil, L.J., Henneman, P.L.: Analyzing medical processes. In: ICSE 2008: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 623–632 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edinburgh Concurrency Workbench, http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/perdita/cwb//

  4. Ellis, C.A., Nutt, G.J.: Modelling and Enactment of Workflow Systems. In: Ajmone Marsan, M. (ed.) ICATPN 1993. LNCS, vol. 691, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg, A.X., Adhikari, N.K.J., McDonald, H.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMIA 293, 1223–1238 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimshaw, J.M., Russel, I.T.: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342, 1317–1322 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Milner, R.: Communicating and Mobile Systems: the Pi-Calculus. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Peleg, M.: A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages. JAMIA 14(6), 781–787 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petri, C.A.: Kommunikation mit Automaten, Bonn: Institut für Instrumentelle Mathematik, Schriften des IIM Nr. 2 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G., Fassino, C., Mossa, C.: Guideline-based careflow systems. Artif. Intell. Med. 20(1), 5–22 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow Control-Flow Patterns: A Revised View, BPM Center Report BPM-06-22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, D.R., Fox, J.: The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma guideline modelling language. JAMIA 10(5), 433–443 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ten Teije, A., Marcos, M., Balser, M., van Croonenborg, J., Duelli, C., van Harmelen, F., Lucas, P., Miksch, S., Reif, W., Rosenbrand, K., Seyfang, A.: Improving medical protocols by formal methods. Artificial Intell. in Medicine 36(3), 193–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., Houben, G.J.: Modelling and analysing workflow using Petri Net based approach. In: Proceedings of Second Workshop on Computer-suppported Cooperative work, Petri nets related formalisms, pp. 31–50 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grando, M.A., Glasspool, D.W., Fox, J. (2009). Petri Nets as a Formalism for Comparing Expressiveness of Workflow-Based Clinical Guideline Languages. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00328-8_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00328-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics