Skip to main content

Using the iCat as Avatar in Remote Meetings

  • Conference paper
Multimodal Signals: Cognitive and Algorithmic Issues

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5398))

  • 1169 Accesses

Abstract

We compared two ways of remote participation in a meeting. One in which a video-connection existed between the remote participant and the collocated participants and one in which the remote participant was represented by an iCat. We asked the participants to rate the conversations on various dimensions. The remote participants tended to prefer the meetings with the iCat whereas the co-located participants preferred the video connection on most dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Clayes, E.L., Anderson, A.H.: Real faces and robot faces: The effects of representation on computer mediated communication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(6), 480–496 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan, S.: Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, 283–292 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garau, M., Slater, M., Bee, S., Sassa, M.A.: The Impact of eye-gaze on communication using avatars. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 309–316 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodwin, C.: Conversational organisation, Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isaacs, E.A., Tang, J.C.: What video can and can’t do for collaborations: a case study. In: Proceedings of the first ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 199–206 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak, K., Biocca, F.: The effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users’ sense of Telepresence, Copresence and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence 12(5) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sellen, A.J.: Remote Conversations: the effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction 10, 401–444 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittaker, S.: Theories and Methods in Mediated Communication. In: Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., Goldman, S. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Processes, pp. 243–286. Erlbaum, NJ (2002); Richardson, D.C., Dale, R.: Grounding dialogue: eye movments reveal the coordination of attention during conversation and the effects of common ground, COGSCY 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, S.: Towards a Taxonomy of Copresence. Presence 12(5), 445–455 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heylen, D., Poel, M., Nijholt, A. (2009). Using the iCat as Avatar in Remote Meetings. In: Esposito, A., Hussain, A., Marinaro, M., Martone, R. (eds) Multimodal Signals: Cognitive and Algorithmic Issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00525-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00525-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00524-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00525-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics