Abstract
Business process and workflow models play important role in developing information system integration and later training of its usage. New ways of working and information system usage practices are designed with as-is and to-be process models, which are implemented into system characteristics. However, after the IS implementation the work practices may become differentiated. Variety of work practices on same business process can have unexpected and harmful social and economic consequences in IS-mediated work environment. This paper employs grounded theory methodology and a case study to explore non-uniformity of work in a retail business organization. By differentiating two types of non-uniform work tasks, the paper shows how process models were designed with less effort, yet maintaining the required amount of uniformity by the organization and support for employees’ uniform actions. In addition to process model designers, the findings help organizations struggling with IS use practices’ consistency to separate practices that may emerge most harmful and practices that are not worth to alter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)
Wagner, E.L., Scott, S.V., Galliers, R.D.: The Creation of ‘Best Practice’ Software: Myth, Reality and Ethics. Information and Organization 16, 251–275 (2006)
Gasser, L.: The Integration of Computing and Routine Work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 205–225 (1986)
Robinson, M.: Design for Unanticipated Use.... In: de Michelis, G., Simone, C., Schmidt, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1993), pp. 187–202. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)
Koivisto, J.: Drifting Work Practices After EPR Implementation: The Case of a Home Health Care Organization. In: 4S & EASST Conference (2004)
Mark, G., Poltrock, S.: Shaping Technology across Social Worlds: Groupware Adoption in a Distributed Organization. In: Schmidt, K., Pendergast, M., Tremaine, M., Simone, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2003), pp. 284–293. ACM, New York (2003)
Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P., Vuorenheimo, J.: Tietojärjestelmän Organisatorinen Käyttöönotto: Kokemuksia ja Suuntaviivoja (Organizational Implementation of IS: Experiences and Guidelines). Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, Turku (2002)
Reijonen, P., Sjöros, A.: Toimintatapojen Vakiintuminen Tietojärjestelmän Käyttöönoton Jälkeen (Stabilization of the Work Practices After IS Implementation). In: SoTeTiTe Conference (2001)
Prinz, W., Mark, G., Pankoke-Babatz, U.: Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 373–382. ACM, New York (1998)
Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M., Elmes, M.B.: Understanding Enterprise Systems-Enabled Integration. European journal of Information Systems 14, 110–120 (2005)
Koivisto, J., Aaltonen, S., Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P.: Työkäytäntöjen Yhtenäisyys Tietojärjestelmän Käyttöönoton jälkeen – Tapaustutkimus Turun Terveystoimen Kotisairaanhoidosta (Uniformity of Work Practices after IS Implementation – A Case Study in Home Care.) Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, Turku (2004)
Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process Modelling. Communications of the ACM 35, 75–90 (1992)
Heritage, J.: Garfinkel and Ethnometodology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1984)
Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge (1984)
Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage, London (1993)
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York (1967)
Nurminen, M.I., Eriksson, I.: Research Notes in Information Systems Research: The ’Infurgic’ Perspective. International Journal of Information Management 19, 87–94 (1999)
Kortteinen, B., Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P., Torvinen, V.: Improving IS Deployment Through Evaluation: Application of the ONION Model. In: Brown, A., Remenyi, D. (eds.) Proceedings of Third European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, pp. 175–181 (1996)
Sharp, A., McDermott, P.: Workflow Modelling: Tools for Process Improvement and Applications Development. Artech House, London (2001)
Reijonen, P., Toivonen, M.: How to Be an Effective End-User? In: Dahlbom, B., Ljungberg, F., Nuldén, U., Simon, K., Stage, J., Sørensen, C. (eds.) Proceedings of IRIS 19, pp. 751–765. Gothenburg Studies of Informatics, Gothenburg (1996)
Yu, C.-S.: Causes Influencing the Effectiveness of the Post-implementation ERP System. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105, 115–132 (2005)
Ellis, C.A.: Workflow Technology. In: Beaudouin-Lafor, M. (ed.) Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 29–54. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1999)
Nutt, G.J.: The Evolution Towards Flexible Workflow Systems. Distributed Systems Engineering 3, 276–294 (1996)
Mackulak, G.T., Lawrence, F.P., Colvin, T.: Effective Simulation Model Reuse: A Case Study for Amhs Modelling. In: Medeiros, D., Watson, E., Carson, J., Manivannan, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 979–984. IEEE Press, New York (1998)
Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26, 87–119 (1994)
Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance Testing: Measuring the Fit and Appropriateness of Event Logs and Process Models. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Interoperability in the ProM Framework. In: Latour, T., Petit, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the CAiSE 2006 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, pp. 619–630. Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tarkkanen, K. (2009). Business Process Modeling for Non-uniform Work. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00670-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00670-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)