Abstract
The mathematical principles of quantum theory provide a general foundation for assigning probabilities to events. This paper examines the application of these principles to the probabilistic inference problem in which hypotheses are evaluated on the basis of a sequence of evidence (observations). The probabilistic inference problem is usually addressed using Bayesian updating rules. Here we derive a quantum inference rule and compare it to the Bayesian rule. The primary difference between these two inference principles arises when evidence is provided by incompatible measures. Incompatibility refers to the case where one measure interferes or disturbs another measure, and so the order of measurement affects the probability of the observations. It is argued that incompatibility often occurs when evidence is obtained from human judgments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L.: A Case for Applying an Abstracted Quantum Formalism to Cognition. In: Campbell, R. (ed.) Mind in Interaction. John Benjamin, Amsterdam (2003)
Bordley, R.F.: Quantum Mechanical and Human Violations of Compound Probability Principles: Toward a Generalized Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Operations Research 46, 923–926 (1998)
Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.T.: Quantum Dynamics of Human Decision Making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50(3), 220–241 (2006)
Degroot, M.H.: Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York (1970)
Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1930, 2001)
Franco, R.: The Conjunction Fallacy and Interference Effects. Journal of Mathematical Psychology (2007) (to appear), arXiv:0708.3948v1 [physics.gen-ph]
Guder, S.P.: Stochastic Methods in Quantum Mechanics. Dover Press (1979)
Hayashi, M.: Quantum Information Theory: An Introduction. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Helstrom, C.W.: Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory. Academic Press, New York (1976)
Holevo, A.S.: Statistical Structure of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Khrennikov, A.: Can Quantum Information be Processed by Macroscopic Systems? Quantum Information Theory (in press, 2007)
Kolmogorov, A.N.: Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Chelsea Publishing Co., New York (1950)
Laskey, K.B.: Quantum Causal Networks. In: Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Stanford University, March 27-29. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)
Luders, G.: Uber die Zustandsanderung durch den Messprozess. Annalen der Physik 8, 322–328 (1951)
La Mura, P., Swiatczak, L.: Markov Entanglement Networks. In: Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Stanford University, March 27-29. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)
Pitowski, I.: Quantum Probability, Quantum logic. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 321. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)
Tucci, R.R.: Quantum Bayesian Nets (1997) quantph/9706039
Von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1932)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Busemeyer, J.R., Trueblood, J. (2009). Comparison of Quantum and Bayesian Inference Models. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5494. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00834-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00834-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00833-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00834-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)