Skip to main content

Design and Verification of Fault-Tolerant Components

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5454))

Abstract

We present a systematic approach to design and verification of fault-tolerant components with real-time properties as found in embedded systems. A state machine model of the correct component is augmented with internal transitions that represent hypothesized faults. Also, constraints on the occurrence or timing of faults are included in this model. This model of a faulty component is then extended with fault detection and recovery mechanisms, again in the form of state machines. Desired properties of the component are model checked for each of the successive models. The models can be made relatively detailed such that they can serve directly as blueprints for engineering, and yet be amenable to exhaustive verification. The approach is illustrated with a design of a triple modular fault-tolerant system that is a real case we received from our collaborators in the aerospace field. We use UPPAAL to model and check this design. Model checking uses concrete parameters, so we extend the result with parametric analysis using abstractions of the automata in a rigorous verification.

Research supported by project No. 60603037, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the HTTS project funded by Macau Science and Technology Development Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M., Lamport, L.: The existence of refinement mapping. Theoretical Computer Science 82(2), 253–284 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Dill, D.L.: A Theory of Timed Automata. Theoretical Computer Science 126(2), 183–235 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B.: Fundamental Concepts of Dependability. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Information Survivability Workshop (ISW 2000), pp. 7–12 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Behrmann, G., David, A., Larsen, K.G.: A tutorial on uppaal. In: Bernardo, M., Corradini, F. (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernardeschi, C., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S.: Model checking fault tolerant systems. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability (STVR) 12(4), 251–275 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Model Checking and Abstraction. ACM Transations on Programming Languadge and Ststems 16(5), 1512–1542 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: On abstraction in software verification. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 37–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dams, D., Gerth, R., Grumberg, O.: Abstract interpretation of reactive systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 19(2), 253–291 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Devillers, M.C.A., Griffioen, W.O.D., Romijn, J.M.T., Vaandrager, F.W.: Verification of a Leader Election Protocol - Formal Methods Applied to IEEE 1394. Formal Methods in System Design 16(3), 307–320 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gebremichael, B., Vaandrager, F.W., Zhang, M.: Analysis of the Zeroconf Protocol Using UPPAAL. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM & IEEE Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT 2006), pp. 242–251. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gnesi, S., Lenzini, G., Martinelli, F.: Logical specification and analysis of fault tolerant systems through partial model checking. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Verification and Validation (SVV 2003). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 118, pp. 57–70 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen, H.E.: Abstraction-Based Verification of Distributed Systems. Phd thesis, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark (June 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen, H.E., Larsen, K.G., Skou, A.: Scaling up uppaal. In: Joseph, M. (ed.) FTRTFT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1926, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, B.W.: Design and analysis of fault-tolerant digital systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Z., Joseph, M.: Specification and verification of fault-tolerance timing, and scheduling. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 21(1), 46–89 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Z., Joseph, M.: Verification of fault-tolerance and real time. In: FTCS 1996, pp. 220–229. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loiseaux, C., Graf, S., Sifakis, J., Bouajjani, A., Bensalem, S.: Property Preserving Abstractions for the Verification of Concurrent Systems. Formal Methods in System Design 6(1), 11–44 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Schneider, F., Easterbrook, S.M., Callahan, J.R., Holzmann, G.J.: Validating requirements for fault tolerant systems using model checking. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 4–13. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simons, D.P.L., Stoelinga, M.: Mechanical verification of the IEEE 1394- a root contention protocol using Uppaal2k. International Journal on Software Tools for Technlogy Transfer, 469–485 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stoelinga, M.I.A., Vaandrager, F.W.: Root contention in IEEE 1394. In: Katoen, J.-P. (ed.) AMAST-ARTS 1999, ARTS 1999, and AMAST-WS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1601, pp. 53–74. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yorav, K.: Exploiting syntactic structure for automatic verification. PhD thesis, The Technion, Israel Insitute of Technology (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, M., Liu, Z., Morisset, C., Ravn, A.P. (2009). Design and Verification of Fault-Tolerant Components. In: Butler, M., Jones, C., Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E. (eds) Methods, Models and Tools for Fault Tolerance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5454. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00867-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00867-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00866-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00867-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics