Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 209))

Abstract

Semantic information retrieval is based on calculating similarity between concepts in a query and documents of a corpus. In this regard, similarity between concept pairs is determined by using an ontology or a meta-thesaurus. Although semantic similarities often convey reasonable meaning, there are cases where calculated semantic similarity fails to detect semantic relevancy between concepts. This problem often occurs when concepts in a corpus have statistical dependencies while they are not conceptually similar. In this paper a concept-based pseudo relevance feedback approach is introduced for discovering statistical relations between concepts in an ontology. Proposed approach consists of adding extra concepts to each query based on the concepts in top ranked documents which are rendered as relevant to that query. Results show that using conceptual relevance feedback would increase mean average precision by 19 percent compared to keyword based approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, A., Rindflesch, T.: Query Expansion Using the UMLS Metathesaurus. In: Proceedings of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, pp. 485–489 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billerbeck, B., Zobel, J.: Techniques for Efficient Query Expansion. In: Apostolico, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) SPIRE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3246, pp. 30–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cui, H., Nie, J.J.: Query expansion by Mining user logs. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 829–839 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gauch, S.: A corpus analysis approach for automatic query expansion and its extension to multiple databases. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 17(3), 250–269 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hersh, W., Price, S., Donohoe, L.: Assessing thesaurus-based query expansion using the UMLS metathesaurus. Journal of Americian Medical Informatics Association Annual Symp. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Houston, A.L., Chen, H.C.: Exploring the use of concept spaces to improve medical information retrieval. Decision Support Systems 30(2), 171–186 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jalali, V., Borujerdi, M.R.M.: The Effect of Using Domain Specific Ontologies in Query Expansion in Medical Field. Innovations in Information Technology, 277–281 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leroy, G., Chen, H.C.: Meeting Medical Terminology Needs: The Ontology-enhanced Medical Concept Mapper. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 5(4), 261–270 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Y., Bandar, Z., McLean, D.: An Approach for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources. IEEE 45 Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandala, R., Tokunaga, T., Tanaka, H.: Combining multiple evidence from different types of thesaurus for query expansion. In: SIGIR 1999: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR, pp. 191–197 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mao, W., Chu, W.: Free-text medical document retrieval via phrase-based vector space model. In: Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symp., vol. 61(1), pp. 76–92 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rada, R., Bicknell, E.: Ranking documents with a thesaurus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40, 304–310 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan, P.: Query Expansion and MEDLINE. Information Processing and Management 32(4), 431–443 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Voorhees, E.M.: Query expansion using lexical-semantic relations. SIGIR 94, 61–69 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yoo, S., Choi, J.: Improving MEDLINE Document Retrieval Using Automatic Query Expansion. In: Goh, D.H.-L., Cao, T.H., Sølvberg, I.T., Rasmussen, E. (eds.) ICADL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4822, pp. 241–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jalali, V., Borujerdi, M.R.M. (2009). Concept Based Pseudo Relevance Feedback in Biomedical Field. In: Lee, R., Ishii, N. (eds) Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01203-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01203-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01202-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01203-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics