Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling The Formation of Language in Embodied Agents: Methods and Open Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents

Abstract

This chapter introduces the cultural approach towards the question how a symbolic communication system could form in a population of agents. This approach emphasises the role of communication, high level cognition, and social interaction. The chapter introduces briefly the main challenges for working out this approach and which methods could be used to address these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arbib, M. (2002). Grounding the mirror system hypothesis for the evolution of the language-ready brain. In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 229–254). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baronchelli, A., Felici, M., Loreto, V., Caglioti, E., & Steels, L. (2006). Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, P06014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 173–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, T. (Ed.) (2002). Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal and computational models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, T. (2003). Grammatical assimilation. In Language evolution: the states of the art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J., Franks, N., Sneyd, J., Bonabeau, E., & Theraulaz, G. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, A., & Parisi, D. (1998). The emergence of a ‘language’ in an evolving population of neural networks. Connection Science, 10(2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, A., & Parisi, D. (Eds.) (2002). Simulating the evolution of language. London: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Asta, L., Baronchelli, A., Barrat, A., & Loreto, V. (2006). Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks. Physical Review E, 74(3), 036105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash, R., Jennings, N., & Parkes, D. (2003). Computational-mechanism design: a call to arms. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vylder, B., & Tuyls, K. (2006). How to reach linguistic consensus: a proof of convergence for the naming game. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242(4), 818–831.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dowman, M., Kirby, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2006). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, M. (2007). Pre-established categories don’t exist. Linguistic Typology, 11(1), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, P. (1991). Emergent grammar. In E. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikegami, T., & Iizuka, H. (2003). Joint attention and dynamics repertoire in coupled dynamical recognizers. In Simulation of adaptive behavior conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, F. (2005). Simple models of distributed co-ordination. Connection Science, 17(3–4), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, J., Minett, J., Au, C.-P., & Wang, W. (2002). Self-organization and selection in the emergence of vocabulary. Complexity, 7(3), 41–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, C., Nehaniv, C. L., & Cangelosi, A. (Eds.) (2007). Lecture notes in computer science. Emergence of language and communication. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2003). Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In M. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution: states of the art (pp. 16–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (1995). A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artificial Life, 2(3), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (2001). Language games for autonomous robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (2004). Constructivist development of grounded construction grammars. In D. Scott, W. Daelemans, & M. Walker (Eds.), Proceedings 42nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 9–19). Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (2006). Collaborative tagging as distributed cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(2), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (2007). The recruitment theory of language origins. In C. Lyon, C. Nehaniv, & A. Cangelosi (Eds.), The emergence of communication and language (pp. 129–151). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L., & Vogt, P. (1997). Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents. In P. Husbands & I. Harvey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th European conference on artificial life (pp. 473–484). Brighton: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szathmáry, E. (1991). Origin of the human language faculty: the language amoeba hypothesis. In J. Trabant & S. Ward (Eds.), Trends in linguistics. New essays on the origins of language (pp. 41–55). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Intersubjectivity: the psychology of an infant communicating. The perceived self (pp. 121–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, E., & Steels, L. (2008). Self-interested agents can bootstrap symbolic communication if they punish cheaters. In A. D. M. Smith, K. Smith, & R. Ferrer-i-Cancho (Eds.), The evolution of language. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the evolution of language (pp. 362–369). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wellens, P., Loetzsch, M., & Steels, L. (2008). Flexible word meaning in embodied agents. Connection Science, 20(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sony-CSL, Paris, France

    Luc Steels

Authors
  1. Luc Steels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Steels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. e Tecnologie della Cognizione, CNR Roma, ISTC - Ist. Scienze, Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, Roma, 00185, Italy

    Stefano Nolfi

  2. e Tecnologie della Cognizione, CNR Roma, ISTC - Ist. Scienze, Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, Roma, 00185, Italy

    Marco Mirolli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steels, L. (2010). Modeling The Formation of Language in Embodied Agents: Methods and Open Challenges. In: Nolfi, S., Mirolli, M. (eds) Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01250-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01250-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01249-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01250-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation