Skip to main content

Transforming a Competency Model to Parameterised Questions in Assessment

  • Conference paper
Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 18))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 620 Accesses

Abstract

The problem of comparing and matching different learners’ knowledge arises when assessment systems use a one-dimensional numerical value to represent “knowledge level”. Such assessment systems may measure inconsistently because they estimate this level differently and inadequately. The multi-dimensional competency model called COMpetence-Based learner knowledge for personalized Assessment (COMBA) is being developed to represent a learner’s knowledge in a multi-dimensional vector space. The heart of this model is to treat knowledge, not as possession, but as a contextualized space of capability either actual or potential. The paper discusses a system for automatically generating questions from the COMBA competency model as a “guide-on-the–side”. The system’s novel design and implementation involves an ontological database that represents the intended learning outcome to be assessed across a number of dimensions, including level of cognitive ability and subject matter. The system generates all the questions that are possible from a given learning outcome, which may then be used to test for understanding, and so could determine the degree to which learners actually acquire the desired knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koper, R., Specht, M.: TenCompetence: Lifelong Competence Development and Learning. In: Sicilia, M.-A. (ed.) Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools. Idea Group (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shepard, L.A.: The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Journal Information for Educational Researcher 29(7), 4–14 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., Davis, H.C.: Towards a competency model for adaptive assessment to support lifelong learning. In: TENCompetence Workshop on Service Oriented Approaches and Lifelong Competence Development Infrastructures, Manchester, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Way, W.D.: Practical Questions in Introducing Computerized Adaptive Testing for K-12 Assessments (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aroyo, L., Dolog, P., Houben, G.J., Kravcik, M., Nilsson, A.N.a.M., Wild, F.: Interoperability in Personalized Adaptive Learning. Education Technology and Society 9(2), 8–14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., Davis, H.C., Gobbi, M.: Adapting health care competencies to a formal competency model. In: The ICALT. IEEE Computer Society Press, Niigata (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. UK Royal College of Nursing, Competencies, http://www.rcn.org.uk/development/communities/specialisms/children_and_young_people/resources/a-z_of_resources/competencies

  8. Ramritu, P.L., Barnard, A.: New nurse graduates’ understanding of competence. International nursing review (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Defloor, T., Hecke, A.V., Verhaeghe, S., Gobert, M., Darras, E., Grypdonck, M.: The clinical nursing competences and their complexity in Belgian general hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(6), 669–678 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bloom, B.S., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals by a committee of college and university examiners. In: Domain, H.I.C. (ed.). Longman, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merrill, M.D.: Component Display Theory, http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/cdt/index.htm

  12. Krathwohl, D.R., Anderson, L.: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 41(4), 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kunzmann, C.: Ontology-based Competence Management for Healthcare Training Planning: A Case Study. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Knowledge Management, Austria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. W3C, SKOS Core Guide, http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/

  15. Johnson, B., Shneiderman, B.: Tree-Maps: a space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Visualization 1991, San Diego, California. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McMillan, J.H.: Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction, 4th edn. Pearson Technology Group, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rolfe, I., MaPherson, J.: Formative assessment: how am I doing? Lacent 345(8953), 837–839 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sewell, J.: Diagnostic assessment within the Skills for Life strategy. In: 30th IAEA Conference, Philadelphia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown, S.: Using Formative Assessment to promote student learning, http://www.ldu.leeds.ac.uk/news/events/documents/BrownPowerPoint.pdf

  20. Nursing and Midwifery Council, http://www.nmc-uk.org/aFrameDisplay.aspx?DocumentID=171

  21. Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive Educational hypermedia, pp. 8–12 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Falmagne, J.-C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J.-P., Thiery, N.: The Assessment of Knowledge, in Theory and in Practice. In: Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. IMS QTI, IMS Question and Test Interoperability Overview, http://www.imsglobal.org/question/qtiv2p1pd2/imsqti_oviewv2p1pd2.html

  25. Kalfoglou, Y.: Exploring Ontologies. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Fundamentals, vol. 1. World Scientific Publishing, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Devedzic, V.: Ontology-Based Automatic Annotation of Learning Content. Semantic Web and Information Systems 2(2), 91–119 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. W3C, Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  28. W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language (OWL), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., Davis, H.C. (2009). Transforming a Competency Model to Parameterised Questions in Assessment. In: Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Filipe, J. (eds) Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01344-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01344-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01343-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01344-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics