Skip to main content

Description and Implementation of a UML Style Guide

  • Conference paper
Models in Software Engineering (MODELS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5421))

Abstract

Model quality is still an open issue, and a first step towards quality could be to establish and use style guides. A style guide is a set of rules aiming to help the developer improving models in many directions such as good practices, methodology, consistency, modeling or architectural style, conventions conformance etc. First, this paper attempts to clarify the meaning of notions being used such as rule or modeling domain semantics. Then, several examples illustrate a possible classification of rules, and the verification process is detailed. A style guide is not universal: each project manager should be able to customize his/her set of rules according to specific needs. In addition to rules expressed in OCL, we describe a user interface to facilitate the specification of rules based on quantifiers, along with the translation of these rules into OCL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambler, S.W.: The Elements of UML 2.0 Style. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bottoni, P., Koch, M., Parisi-Presicce, F., Taentzer, G.: A visualization of OCL using collaborations. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Caplat, G., Sourrouille, J.L.: MDA: Model Mapping using Formalism Extension. IEEE Software 22(2), 44–51 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farkas, T., Hein, C., Ritter, T.: Automatic Evaluation of Modeling Rules and Design Guidelines. In: Proc. of the Workshop From code centric to Model centric Soft. Eng., http://www.esi.es/modelware/c2m/papers.php

  6. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff, TR MCS00-16, The Weizmann Institute of Science (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hnatkowska, B.: Verification of Good Design Style of UML Models. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Information System Implementation and Modeling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO, International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9126-1:2001, Software engineering – Product quality, Part 1: Quality model (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiesner, C., Taentzer, G., Winkelmann, J.: Visual OCL: A Visual Notation of the Object Constraint Language. Technical Report 2002/23, Tech. Univ. of Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuzniarz, L., Pareto, L., Sourrouille, J.-L., Staron, M.: Third intenational workshop on quality in modeling. In: Giese, H. (ed.) MoDELS 2007 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5002, pp. 271–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange, C.F.J., DuBois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S.: Experimentally investigating the effectiveness and effort of modeling conventions for the UML. CS-Report 06-14, Tech. Univ. Eindhoven (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malgouyres, H., Motet, G.: A UML model consistency verification approach based on meta-modelling formalization. In: Biham, E., Youssef, A.M. (eds.) SAC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4356, pp. 1804–1809. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sourrouille, J.-L., Caplat, G.: A Pragmatic View about Consistency Checking of UML Model, Work. Consistency Problems in UML-Based Software Dev., pp. 43–50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. UML, OMG Unified Modeling Language, Version 2.1.2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sourrouille, J.L., Hindawi, M., Morel, L., Aubry, R.: Specifying consistent subsets of UML. In: Proc. Educators Symposium, Models 2008, pp. 26–38 (2008) ISBN 83-916444-8-0

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hindawi, M., Morel, L., Aubry, R., Sourrouille, J.L.: Description and Implementation of a Style Guide for UML. In: Proc. 3rd Workshop on Quality in Modeling, IT Univ Göteborg RR 2008:02, pp. 31–45 (2008) ISSN 1654-4870

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hindawi, M., Morel, L., Aubry, R., Sourrouille, JL. (2009). Description and Implementation of a UML Style Guide. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (eds) Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5421. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01647-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01648-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics