Skip to main content

Context Graphs — Representing Formal Concepts by Connected Subgraphs

  • Conference paper
Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5548))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The article introduces a representation of a formal context by an undirected graph called a context graph with the formal objects being the nodes of the graph. We use as a defining property for this graph that it contains every concept extent as a connected subgraph. The graph is not uniquely defined by this property — we focus on those graphs that are edge-minimal and present a result with respect to the number of their edges. We then study how the structure of an edge-minimal context graph can be updated to adjust to the subsequent addition of an object to the context. This leads to an incremental construction algorithm that does not require the explicit computation of formal concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(6–9), 493–515 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, A., Gardner, B.B., Gardner, M.R.: Deep South. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuznetsov, S.O., Obiedkov, S.A.: Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattices. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14, 189–216 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval. Knowledge Organization 27(3), 132–142 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpineto, C.: Conceptual structures in modern information retrieval. In: [16], p. 1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delteil, A., Faron, C., Dieng, R.: Building concept lattices by learning concepts from RDF graphs annotating web documents. In: [16], pp. 191–204

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duquenne, V., Chabert, C., Cherfouh, A., Delabar, J.M., Doyen, A.L., Pickering, D.: Structuration of phenotypes/genotypes through Galois lattices and implications. In: The 2001 International Workshop on Concept Lattice-based theory, methods and tools for Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Stanford University, CA, USA, July 30 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Godin, R., Mili, H.: Building and maintaining analysis-level class hierarchies using Galois lattices. In: Paepcke, A. (ed.) The Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, Washington, DC, pp. 394–410 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Information retrieval through hybrid navigation of lattice representations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(5), 553–578 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: Query formulation as an information retrieval problem. The Computer Journal 39(4), 255–274 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferré, S.: CAMELIS: Organizing and browsing a personal photo collection with a logical information system. In: Diatta, J., Eklund, P., Liquière, M. (eds.) The International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 331, pp. 112–123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lindig, C.: Fast concept analysis. In: Working with Conceptual Structures - Contributions to ICCS 2000, pp. 152–161. Shaker Verlag (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breiger, R.L.: The duality of persons and groups. In: Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.) Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 83–98. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Priss, U., Corbett, D.R., Angelova, G. (eds.): ICCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2393. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kötters, J., Schmidt, H., Squire, D.M. (2009). Context Graphs — Representing Formal Concepts by Connected Subgraphs. In: Ferré, S., Rudolph, S. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5548. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01815-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01815-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01814-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01815-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics