Abstract
The purpose of this work is to reduce the workload of human experts in building systematic reviews from published articles, used in evidence-based medicine. We propose to use a committee of classifiers to rank biomedical abstracts based on the predicted relevance to the topic under review. In our approach, we identify two subsets of abstracts: one that represents the top, and another that represents the bottom of the ranked list. These subsets, identified using machine learning (ML) techniques, are considered zones where abstracts are labeled with high confidence as relevant or irrelevant to the topic of the review. Early experiments with this approach using different classifiers and different representation techniques show significant workload reduction.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M., Gray, J.A., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023), 71–72 (1996)
TrialStat corporation web resources, http://www.trialstat.com/
Pedersen, T., Kulkarni, A., Angheluta, R., Kozareva, Z., Solorio, T.: An Unsupervised Language Independent Method of Name Discrimination Using Second Order Co-occurrence Features. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2006. LNCS, vol. 3878, pp. 208–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Rennie, J., Shih, L., Teevan, J., Karger, D.: Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. In: ICML 2003, Washington DC (2003)
Su, J., Zhang, H., Ling, C.X., Matwin, S.: Discriminative Parameter Learning for Bayesian Networks. In: ICML 2008 (2008)
Freund, Y., Mason, L.: The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. In: Proceeding of the 16th International Conference on ML, Slovenia, pp. 124–133 (1999)
Freund, Y., Schapire, R.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Thirteenth International Conference on ML, San Francisco, pp. 148–156 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kouznetsov, A. et al. (2009). Classifying Biomedical Abstracts Using Committees of Classifiers and Collective Ranking Techniques. In: Gao, Y., Japkowicz, N. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5549. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01818-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01818-3_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01817-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01818-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)