Summary
Establishing interoperable systems is a complex operation that goes far beyond the technical interconnectedness of databases and systems. Interoperability emerges from the need to communicate data across different domains for a specific purpose. Transferring the data may represent a technical challenge because of different protocols, standards, formats and so forth. However, the most difficult challenge lies in reconciling and aligning the purpose, use and other changes consequent on transferring that data. Changes in data ownership and custodianship have an effect on power structures, roles and responsibilities and on risk. In the first part of this chapter our aim is to develop an understanding of the term ‘interoperability’ as it currently applies to the area of identity management. We propose a three-fold conception of interoperability in IdMS, involving technical, but also formal-policy, legal and regulatory components, as well as informal-behavioural and cultural aspects. Having noted the official EU/government agenda as regards interoperable IdMS, the second part of the chapter is concerned with the perspective of other important stakeholders on the same topic. First, the views of experts from private and public sectors across Europe are presented. Following this, the perceptions and attitudes of EU citizens towards interoperable IdMS are discussed. Together, the findings presented point to the crucial challenges and implications associated with the sharing of personal data in the provision of eGovernment, eHealth and related services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Backhouse, J. (1996), ‘Information@Risk’, Information Strategy 3: 33–35.
Backhouse, J. and Halperin, R. (eds.) (2007), FIDIS Deliverable D4.4: Survey on Citizen's trust in ID systems and authorities, Download: www.fidis.net.
Backhouse, J. and Halperin, R. (2008), ‘Security and Privacy Perceptions of eID: A Grounded Research’, European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland.
Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. (1998), Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Buckingham.
Beech, D. (1997), ‘Data semantics on the information superhighway’, pp 12–33 in: Meers-man, R., Mark, L. (eds.), Database Application Semantics. Chapman and Hall.
Brodeur, J. et al. (2003), ‘Revisiting the Concept of Geospatial Interoperability within the Scope of Human Communication Processes’, Transactions in GIS 7 (2): 243–265.
BTT: Biometric Technology Today Sept 2003.
Castells, M. (2001), The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Chen, D. and Doumeingts, G. (2003), ‘European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications — basic concepts, framework and roadmap’, Annual Reviews in Control 27: 153–162.
Choi, S.-Y. and Whinston, A. B. (2000), ‘Benefits and requirements for interoperability in the electronic marketplace’, Technology in Society 22: 33–44.
European Commission DGV (1999), ‘Free Movement and Social Security: Citizens’ Rights when Moving within the EU’, Bulletin No. 2.
Harvey, F. et al. (1999), ‘Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information’, The Annals of Regional Science 33: 213–232.
Homburg, V. and Bekkers, V. (2002) ‘The Back-Office of E-Government (Managing Information Domains as Political Economies)’, IEEE proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
IDABC (2005), ‘European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services’, V 1.0. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=19529.
Kinder, T. (2003), ‘Mrs Miller moves house: the interoperability of local public services in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 13 (2): 141–157.
Klischewski, R. (2003), ‘Top Down or Bottom Up? How to Establish a Common Ground for Semantic Interoperability within e-Government Communities’, in Traunmüller, R., Palmirani, M. (eds.), E-Government: Modelling Norms and Concepts as Key Issues, Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on E-Government at ICAIL 2003. Bologna: Geditedizioni, 17–26.
Kraemer, K. L. and King, J. L. (1986), ‘Computing and Public Organisations’, Public Administration Review, Special Issue: 488–496.
Landsbergen, D. and Wolken, G. (2001), ‘Realizing the promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology’, Public Administration Review 61 (2): 206–220.
Liebenau, J. and Backhouse, J. (1990), Understanding Information: An Introduction. Bas-ingstoke and London, Macmillan Press.
Lee, J. L. and Siegel, M. D. (1996), ‘An ontological and semantical approach to source-receiver interoperability’, Decision Support Systems 18: 145–158.
Meersman, R. (1997), ‘An essay on the role and evolution of data(base) semantics’, pp 1–7 in: Meersman, R. and Mark, L. (eds.), Database Application Semantics. Chapman and Hall.
Miller, B. et al. (2001), ‘Towards a Framework for Managing the Information Environment’, Information, Knowledge, Systems Management 2: 359–384.
Moen, W. E. (1994), ‘Information Technology Standards: A Component of Federal Information Policy’, Government Information Quarterly 1 (4): 357–371.
Moen, W. E. (2000), ‘Interoperability for Information Access: Technical Standards and Policy Considerations’, The Journal of Academic Librarianship 26 (2): 129–132.
Mulley, C. and Nelson, J. D. (1999), ‘Interoperability and transport policy: the impediments to interoperability in the organisation of trans-European transport systems’, Journal of Transport Geography 7 (2): 93–104.
Ouksel, A. M. and Sheth, A. (1999), ‘Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems: A brief introduction to the research area and the special section’, SIGMOD Record 28 (1): 5–12.
Prokopiadou G., Papatheodorou C., Moschopoulos D. (2004) ‘Integrating knowledge management tools for government information’, Government Information Quarterly 21: 170–198.
Stamper, R. et al. (2000), ‘Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organisations — a semiotic approach to information systems design’, Behaviour & Information Technology 19 (1): 15–27.
Schnittger, B. (2005), ‘Introducing IDABC: European Integration by Electronic Means’, SYNeRGY (01), 3–6.
Scholl, H. J. (2005), ‘Interoperability in E-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware’, HICSS ‘05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 123–123.
Sheth, A. (1996), ‘Data Semantics: What, Where and How?’ Paper presented at the 6th IFIP Working Conference on Data Semantics (DS-6), Atlanta, GA.
Sheth, A. (1997, 3+4 December 1997), ‘Semantic Interoperability in Infocosm: Beyond Infrastructural and data interoperability in federated information systems’, Paper presented at the International Conference on Interoperating Geographic Systems (In-terop'97), Santa Barbara.
Threlfall, M. (2003), ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and single social areas’, Journal of European Social Policy 13 (2): 121–139.
Wavell, S. (1998), ‘Your Very Good Health — in a Foreign Body’, Sunday Times, 31 May: 11.
Wimmer, M. and Von Bredow, B. (2002), ‘A holistic approach for providing security solutions in e-government’, System Sciences. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 1715–1724.
Woodall, S. R. (2000), ‘Self-jamming behaviour: Joint Interoperability, Root Causes, and Thoughts on Solutions’, Comparative Strategy 19:, 309–317.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Backhouse, J., Halperin, R. (2009). Approaching Interoperability for Identity Management Systems. In: Rannenberg, K., Royer, D., Deuker, A. (eds) The Future of Identity in the Information Society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01820-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01820-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88480-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01820-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)