Skip to main content

Approaching Interoperability for Identity Management Systems

  • Chapter
The Future of Identity in the Information Society

Summary

Establishing interoperable systems is a complex operation that goes far beyond the technical interconnectedness of databases and systems. Interoperability emerges from the need to communicate data across different domains for a specific purpose. Transferring the data may represent a technical challenge because of different protocols, standards, formats and so forth. However, the most difficult challenge lies in reconciling and aligning the purpose, use and other changes consequent on transferring that data. Changes in data ownership and custodianship have an effect on power structures, roles and responsibilities and on risk. In the first part of this chapter our aim is to develop an understanding of the term ‘interoperability’ as it currently applies to the area of identity management. We propose a three-fold conception of interoperability in IdMS, involving technical, but also formal-policy, legal and regulatory components, as well as informal-behavioural and cultural aspects. Having noted the official EU/government agenda as regards interoperable IdMS, the second part of the chapter is concerned with the perspective of other important stakeholders on the same topic. First, the views of experts from private and public sectors across Europe are presented. Following this, the perceptions and attitudes of EU citizens towards interoperable IdMS are discussed. Together, the findings presented point to the crucial challenges and implications associated with the sharing of personal data in the provision of eGovernment, eHealth and related services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Backhouse, J. (1996), ‘Information@Risk’, Information Strategy 3: 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, J. and Halperin, R. (eds.) (2007), FIDIS Deliverable D4.4: Survey on Citizen's trust in ID systems and authorities, Download: www.fidis.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, J. and Halperin, R. (2008), ‘Security and Privacy Perceptions of eID: A Grounded Research’, European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. (1998), Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, D. (1997), ‘Data semantics on the information superhighway’, pp 12–33 in: Meers-man, R., Mark, L. (eds.), Database Application Semantics. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, J. et al. (2003), ‘Revisiting the Concept of Geospatial Interoperability within the Scope of Human Communication Processes’, Transactions in GIS 7 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BTT: Biometric Technology Today Sept 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001), The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. and Doumeingts, G. (2003), ‘European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications — basic concepts, framework and roadmap’, Annual Reviews in Control 27: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.-Y. and Whinston, A. B. (2000), ‘Benefits and requirements for interoperability in the electronic marketplace’, Technology in Society 22: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission DGV (1999), ‘Free Movement and Social Security: Citizens’ Rights when Moving within the EU’, Bulletin No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, F. et al. (1999), ‘Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information’, The Annals of Regional Science 33: 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, V. and Bekkers, V. (2002) ‘The Back-Office of E-Government (Managing Information Domains as Political Economies)’, IEEE proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDABC (2005), ‘European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services’, V 1.0. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=19529.

  • Kinder, T. (2003), ‘Mrs Miller moves house: the interoperability of local public services in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 13 (2): 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klischewski, R. (2003), ‘Top Down or Bottom Up? How to Establish a Common Ground for Semantic Interoperability within e-Government Communities’, in Traunmüller, R., Palmirani, M. (eds.), E-Government: Modelling Norms and Concepts as Key Issues, Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on E-Government at ICAIL 2003. Bologna: Geditedizioni, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K. L. and King, J. L. (1986), ‘Computing and Public Organisations’, Public Administration Review, Special Issue: 488–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsbergen, D. and Wolken, G. (2001), ‘Realizing the promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology’, Public Administration Review 61 (2): 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenau, J. and Backhouse, J. (1990), Understanding Information: An Introduction. Bas-ingstoke and London, Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. L. and Siegel, M. D. (1996), ‘An ontological and semantical approach to source-receiver interoperability’, Decision Support Systems 18: 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meersman, R. (1997), ‘An essay on the role and evolution of data(base) semantics’, pp 1–7 in: Meersman, R. and Mark, L. (eds.), Database Application Semantics. Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. et al. (2001), ‘Towards a Framework for Managing the Information Environment’, Information, Knowledge, Systems Management 2: 359–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, W. E. (1994), ‘Information Technology Standards: A Component of Federal Information Policy’, Government Information Quarterly 1 (4): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, W. E. (2000), ‘Interoperability for Information Access: Technical Standards and Policy Considerations’, The Journal of Academic Librarianship 26 (2): 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulley, C. and Nelson, J. D. (1999), ‘Interoperability and transport policy: the impediments to interoperability in the organisation of trans-European transport systems’, Journal of Transport Geography 7 (2): 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouksel, A. M. and Sheth, A. (1999), ‘Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems: A brief introduction to the research area and the special section’, SIGMOD Record 28 (1): 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopiadou G., Papatheodorou C., Moschopoulos D. (2004) ‘Integrating knowledge management tools for government information’, Government Information Quarterly 21: 170–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, R. et al. (2000), ‘Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organisations — a semiotic approach to information systems design’, Behaviour & Information Technology 19 (1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnittger, B. (2005), ‘Introducing IDABC: European Integration by Electronic Means’, SYNeRGY (01), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, H. J. (2005), ‘Interoperability in E-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware’, HICSS ‘05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 123–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, A. (1996), ‘Data Semantics: What, Where and How?’ Paper presented at the 6th IFIP Working Conference on Data Semantics (DS-6), Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, A. (1997, 3+4 December 1997), ‘Semantic Interoperability in Infocosm: Beyond Infrastructural and data interoperability in federated information systems’, Paper presented at the International Conference on Interoperating Geographic Systems (In-terop'97), Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threlfall, M. (2003), ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and single social areas’, Journal of European Social Policy 13 (2): 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wavell, S. (1998), ‘Your Very Good Health — in a Foreign Body’, Sunday Times, 31 May: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, M. and Von Bredow, B. (2002), ‘A holistic approach for providing security solutions in e-government’, System Sciences. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 1715–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodall, S. R. (2000), ‘Self-jamming behaviour: Joint Interoperability, Root Causes, and Thoughts on Solutions’, Comparative Strategy 19:, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Backhouse, J., Halperin, R. (2009). Approaching Interoperability for Identity Management Systems. In: Rannenberg, K., Royer, D., Deuker, A. (eds) The Future of Identity in the Information Society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01820-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics