Abstract
We study a variant of Naor’s [23] online packet buffering model: We are given a (non-preemptive) fifo buffer (e.g., in a network switch or a router) and packets that request transmission arrive over time. Any packet has an intrinsic value R and we have to decide whether to accept or reject it. In each time-step, the first packet in the buffer (if any) is transmitted and our benefit of it is equal to its intrinsic value minus the time it spent in the buffer. The objective is to maximize the total benefit. From a worst-case perspective, Fiat et al. [14] gave a threshold algorithm with a competitive ratio equal to the golden ratio φ ≈ 1.618. Due to the insensitivity of the algorithms towards the input, it was conjectured that this competitive ratio is too pessimistic for packet sequences occurring in practice.
In this paper, we treat this conjecture from an analytical and experimental point of view. In the analytical part, we assume Poisson arrivals and compute a threshold for this algorithm depending on the arrival rate λ and the value R of the packets. This also yields bounds on the (expected) competitive ratio of the algorithm. We discover the phenomenon that the ratio converges to one if R grows or λ moves away from one. Thus (for fixed R) we have that the largest competitive ratios occur for λ= 1. In that case, the bound is essentially \(R / (R - \sqrt{R})\) and gives values smaller than φ for R ≥ 8.
In a second, experimental, part of our study, we compared the competitive ratios achieved by the two threshold algorithms on actual network traffic with our theoretical prediction (which assumes Poisson arrivals). It turns out that the prediction and the measured ratios for our threshold are consistent, where the prediction even tends to be pessimistic. Furthermore, the measured ratios with our threshold where substantially smaller than φ and even almost everywhere below the ratios achieved with the threshold of [14].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aiello, W., Mansour, Y., Rajagopolan, S., Rosen, A.: Competitive queue policies for differentiated services. In: Proc. INFOCOM, pp. 431–440 (2000)
Albers, S., Jacobs, T.: An experimental study of new and known online packet buffering algorithms. In: Arge, L., Hoffmann, M., Welzl, E. (eds.) ESA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4698, pp. 754–765. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Albers, S., Schmidt, M.: On the performance of greedy algorithms in packet buffering. In: Proc. 36th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2004), pp. 35–44 (2004)
Andelman, N., Mansour, Y., Zhu, A.: Competitive queueing policies for QoS switches. In: Proc. of 14th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 761–770 (2003)
Azar, Y., Richter, Y.: Management of multi-queue switches in QoS networks. In: Proc. 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2003), pp. 82–89 (2003)
Barry, D.A., Parlange, J.-Y., Li, L., Prommer, H., Cunningham, C.J., Stagnitti, F.: Analytical approximations for real values of the Lambert W-function. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 53, 95–103 (2000)
Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online computation and competitive analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brun, O., Garcia, J.: Analytical solution of finite capacity M/D/1 queues. J. Appl. Prob. 37, 1092–1098 (2000)
Cao, J., Ramanan, K.: A Poisson limit for buffer overflow probabilities. In: IEEE Infocom (2002)
Chin, F.Y.L., Fung, S.P.Y.: Online scheduling with partial job values: Does timesharing or randomization help? Algorithmica 37(3), 149–164 (2003)
Corless, R.M., Gonnet, G.H., Hare, D.E.G., Jeffrey, D.J., Knuth, D.E.: On the Lambert W function. Adv. Computational Maths. 5, 329–359 (1996)
Englert, M., Westermann, M.: Considering suppressed packets improves buffer management in qos switches. In: Proc. of 18th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (2007)
Experimental results, http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~souza
Fiat, A., Mansour, Y., Nadav, U.: Competitive Queue Management for Latency Sensitive Packets. In: Proc. of 19th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 228–237 (2008)
Gelenbe, E., Pujolle, G.: Introduction to queueing networks. John Wiley, cop., Chichester (1998)
Internet Traffic Archive, http://ita.ee.lbl.gov/
Kesselman, A., Lotker, Z., Mansour, Y., Patt-Shamir, B., Schieber, B., Sviridenko, M.: Buffer overflow management in QoS switches. SIAM J. on Computing 33(3), 563–583 (2004)
Leland, W., Taqqu, M., Willinger, W., Wilson, D.: On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic (Extended Version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2(1), 1–15 (1994)
Li, F., Sethuraman, J., Stein, C.: An optimal online algorithm for packet scheduling with agreeable deadlines. In: Proc. of 16th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (2005)
Li, Y., Qiu, H., Gu, X., Lan, J., Yang, J.: Design and Buffer Sizing of TCAM-Based Pipelined Forwarding Engines. In: Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Networking and Applications, pp. 769–776 (2007)
Lotker, Z., Patt-Shamir, B.: Nearly optimal FIFO buffer management for DiffServ. In: Proc. 21st ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 134–143 (2002)
Nadav, U.: Personnal communication (2007)
Naor, P.: The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37(1), 15–24 (1969)
Paxson, V., Floyd, S.: Wide-Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 3(3), 226–244 (1995)
Raina, G., Wischik, D.: Buffer sizes for large multiplexers: TCP queueing theory and instability analysis. In: EuroNGI (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Al-Bawani, K., Souza, A. (2009). Competitive Buffer Management with Stochastic Packet Arrivals. In: Vahrenhold, J. (eds) Experimental Algorithms. SEA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5526. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02011-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02011-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02010-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02011-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)