Skip to main content

Use and Trust of Simple Independent Open Learner Models to Support Learning within and across Courses

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5535))

Abstract

This paper introduces two independent open learner models (learner models that are accessible to user viewing), which are deployed alongside university courses to facilitate self-assessment skills, planning and independent learning. OLMlets is used in specific courses, while UK-SpecIAL, a modular extension to OLMlets, draws on the OLMlets learner models to display progress towards achieving learning outcomes applicable across courses. User logs demonstrate usage of each system, and questionnaire responses provide insight into the reasons for user trust in the environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robinson, S.L.: Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 574–599 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, J.D., Weigert, A.: Trust as Social Reality. J. Social Forces 63, 967–985 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madsen, M., Gregor, S.: Measuring Human-Computer Trust. In: Gable, G., Viatle, M. (eds.) 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, vol. 53 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tanimoto, S.: Dimensions of Transparency in Open Learner Models. In: LeMoRe Workshop, Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, pp. 100–106 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI Open Learner Modelling Framework. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 17(2), 89–120 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad, N., Bull, S.: Do Students Trust their Open Learner Models? In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 255–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmad, N., Bull, S.: Learner Trust in Learner Model Externalisations. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education 2009, IOS Press, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Land, S.M., Hanaffin, M.J.: Student-Centered Learning Environments: Foundations, Assumptions, and Implications. In: 18th Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 394–400 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Higher Education Academy/Juwah et al. Enhancing Student Learning Through Effective Formative Feedback (2004), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk

  10. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Metacognition and Open Learner Models. In: Workshop on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies. Int. Tutoring Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kay, J.: Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. In: Halim, Z., Ottomann, T., Razak, Z. (eds.) Int. Conference on Computers in Education, AACE, pp. 17–24 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boud, D.: Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In: Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (eds.) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page, London, pp. 18–40. Nichols Pub., New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schon, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, USA (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dimitrova, V.: StyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(1), 35–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of open learner models. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 689–698. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Perez-Marin, D., Alfonseca, E., Rodriguez, P., Pascual-Neito, I.: A Study on the Possibility of Automatically Estimating the Confidence Value of Students’ Knowledge in Generated Conceptual Models. J. of Computers 2(5), 17–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E.: Interacting with Inspectable Bayesian Models. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14, 127–163 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bull, S., Mabbott, A., Gardner, P., Jackson, T., Lancaster, M., Quigley, S., Childs, P.A.: Supporting Interaction Preferences and Recognition of Misconceptions with Independent Open Learner Models. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 62–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 121–144 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weber, G., Brusilovsky, P.: ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-Based Instruction. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 351–384 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engineering Council. UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, The Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes (2004), http://www.engc.org.uk/documents/Accreditation_HE_Progs.pdf

  22. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw Hill, OUP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). Handbook of Learning Outcomes for BEng and MEng Degree Programmes (2006), http://www2.theiet.org

  24. Jameson, A.: Adaptive Interfaces and Agents. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 2nd edn., Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bull, S., Quigley, S., Mabbott, A.: Computer-Based Formative Assessment to Promote Reflection and Learner Autonomy. Engineering Education 1, 8–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Buzzetto-More, N.A., Alade, A.J., Panda, D.: Using e-Learning to Drive a Student Learning Outcomes Based Assessment Program. In: Buzzetto-More, N.A. (ed.) Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning, pp. 213–244. Informing Science Press, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maddocks, A.: EASIMAP: A Coherent Approach to the Assessment of Learning Outcomes on Engineering Degree Programmes. Engineering Education 2(2), 26–32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Avitabile, P., McKelliget, J., Van Zandt, T.: Interweaving Numerical Processing Techniques in Multisemester Projects. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bull, S., Gardner, P., Ahmad, N., Ting, J., Clarke, B. (2009). Use and Trust of Simple Independent Open Learner Models to Support Learning within and across Courses. In: Houben, GJ., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5535. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02246-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02247-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics