Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5518))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this work it is addressed the problem of information evaluation and decision making process in Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). A Multi-valued Extended Logic Programming language is used for imperfect information representation and reasoning. A model embodying the quality evaluation of the information, along the several stages of the decision making process, is presented. This way we give the decision makers a measure of the value of the information that supports the decision itself. This model is presented in the context of a GDSS for VirtualECare, a system aimed at sustaining online healthcare services. Reasoning with incomplete and uncertain knowledge has to be dealt with in this kind of environment, due to the particular nature of the healthcare services, where the awful consequences of bad decisions, or lack of timely ones, demand for a responsible answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costa, R., et al.: VirtualECare: Group Decision Supported by Idea Generation and Argumentation. In: The 9th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (PRO-VE 2008), Poznan, Poland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parsons, S.: Current approaches to handling imperfect information in data and knowledge bases. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Eng. 8(3), 353–372 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apt, K.R., Bol, R.: Logic Programming and Negation: A Survey. Journal of Logic Programming 19, 9–71 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Denecker, M., Kakas, A.: Abduction in logic programming. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds.) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. LNCS, vol. 2407, pp. 402–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic. Scholarpedia 3, 1766 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hustadt, U.: Do we need the closed-world assumption in knowledge representation? In: Baader, Buchheit, Nutt (eds.) KI 1994 Workshop. Saarbrüken, Germany (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Logic Programs with Classical Negation. In: Warren, D., Szeredi, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 579–597 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lima, L., et al.: Quality of Information in the context of Ambient Assisted Living. In: Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 624–633. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burstein, F., Holsapple, C.W. (eds.): Handbook on Decision Support Systems: Basic Themes. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sprague, R.H., Carlson, E.D.: Building Effective Decision Support Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Power, D.J.: Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, J., et al.: Multi-objective Group Decision Making: Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Techniques. Series in Electric and Computer Engineering. Imperial College Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Humphreys, P., Nappelbaum, E.L.: Structure and communications in the process of organisational change: Eastern European experience and its general relevance. In: Humphreys, P., et al. (eds.) Decision Support in Organizational Transformation: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.3 International Conference on Organizational Transformation and Decision Support. Springer, La Gomera (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, G., Humphreys, P.: The Decision Hedgehog: Enhancing Contextual Knowledge for Group Decision Authoring and Communication Support. In: Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Paris, France. CEUR-WS (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kolbin, V.V.: Decision Making and Programming. World Scientific, Singapore (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, vol. 3. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nappelbaum, E.: Systems logic for problem formulation and choice. In: Humphreys, P., et al. (eds.) Decision Support in Organizational Transformation: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.3 International Conference on Organizational Transformation and Decision Support. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lima, L., Novais, P., Cruz, J.B. (2009). A Process Model for Group Decision Making with Quality Evaluation. In: Omatu, S., et al. Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5518. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02480-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02481-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics