Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify a method for quantitatively evaluating the relationship among the four perspectives of the BSC. In order to establish the purpose of this study, we (1) clarify the methodology to quantitatively understand the vision and relationship among the four perspectives, (2) analyze the KPI data of a corporation model which is similar to practical business with the evaluation method shown in this study and (3) verify the practical effectiveness of the method based on the obtained results.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1), 71–79 (1992)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review 85(7-8), 150–161 (2007)
Taguchi, Y., Ota, M., Tabe, T.: A method for quantitatively appraising strategy penetration in BSC. In: 2nd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, CD-ROM (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taguchi, Y., Kaneko, T., Tabe, T. (2009). A Method for Evaluating the Relationship among Four Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information Environments. Human Interface 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5617. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02556-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02556-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02555-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02556-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)