Abstract
Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) are a viable technology for providing access to Electronic Medical Records at the point-of-care. However, acceptance of this technology by clinicians will depend on how easy they can make the transition from the system they normally use to a PDA-based system. Since many hospitals are still using paper-based patient record systems this study intends to provide some insight on the aspects that need to be considered in the transition from a paper-based system to a PDA-based system. The study compares the interaction of nurses with PDA-based and paper-based nursing documentation systems in terms of performance and subjective satisfaction. Twenty staff nurses from a metropolitan hospital performed twelve tasks on each system. The study supports the conclusion that a PDA-based nursing documentation system can be superior to a paper-based system in term of performance for tasks that don’t required writing notes. Nurses were significantly more satisfied with the PDA-based system than with the paper-based system with every interaction and system aspect evaluated on the study. In general the results of the study provide hard evidence to predict an easy transition for nurses from a paper-based system to a PDA-based system nursing documentation system.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Iller, C., Eichstader, R.: Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study. JAMIA 10, 69–84 (2002)
Charters, K., Cappello, C.: Informatics in Clinical Practice. In: Foster, S.D., Fault-Callahan, M. (eds.) A Professional Study and Resource Guide for the CRNA, pp. 489–502. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, Park Ridge (2001)
Charters, K.: Nursing Informatics, Outcomes, and Quality Improvement. AACN Clinical Issues: Advanced Practice in Acute and Critical Care 14, 282–294 (2003)
Jao, C., Hier, S.: Evaluating a Digital Resident Diagnosis Log: Reasons for Limited Acceptance of a PDA Solution. In: Proc. AMIA Symposium 2003, p. 876 (2003)
Lu, Y.C., et al.: Why Don’t Physicians Use Their Personal Digital Assistants? In: Proc. AMIA Symposium, p. 405 (2003)
Rinkus, S., Chitwood, A.: Cognitive Analyses of a Paper Medical Record and Electronic Medical Record on the Documentation of Two Nursing Tasks: Patient Education and Adherence Assessment of Insulin Administration. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 657–661 (2002)
Rodríguez, N.J., Borges, J.A., Soler, Y., Murillo, V.L., Sands, D.Z.: A usability study of physicians interaction with PDA and laptop applications to access an electronic patient record system. In: 17th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (2004)
Rodríguez, N.J., Borges, J.A., Soler, Y., Murillo, V.L., Colón, C.R.: PDA vs. laptop: a comparison of two versions of a nursing documentation application. In: Proc. of the 16th IEEE Symp. on Computer-Based Medical Systems (2003)
Rodriguez, N.J., Borges, J.A., Murillo, V.L., Sands, D.Z., Ortiz, J.: A Usability Study of Physicians Interaction with a Paper-Based Patient Record System and a Graphical-Based Electronic Patient Record System. In: Proc. AMIA Symp. 2002 (November 2002)
Wilcox, A., Jones, S.S., Dorr, D.A., et al.: Use and impact of a computer-generated patient summary worksheet for primary care. In: AMIA Symp., pp. 824–828 (2005)
Young, P.M.C., Leung, R.M.W., Ho, L.M., McGhee, S.M.: An Evaluation of the Use of Hand-Held Computers for Bedside Nursing Care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 62, 189–193 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodríguez, N.J. et al. (2009). Users Can Do Better with PDAs Than Paper: A Usability Study of PDA-Based vs. Paper-Based Nursing Documentation Systems. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services. UAHCI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5616. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_42
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02712-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02713-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)