Abstract
In this paper, we propose a distance-based operator to revise ontologies with acyclic generalized terminology as its TBOX in description logic \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\). Our operator resolves incoherence between the original ontology and the newly received ontology. We first reformulate Dalal’s operator to \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\), and propose a query-equivalent syntactical formulation based on a notion called a revision policy. We then propose a tableau algorithm to generate such revision policies and prove the correctness of the algorithm. We show that the complexity of our algorithm stays at the same level as that of satisfiability check in \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\).
Guilin Qi is partially supported by the EU in the IST project NeOn. Zhisheng Huang is partially supported by EU-funded Projects OpenKnowledge and LarKC. We thank the reviewers for very helpful comments to improve the quality of our work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haase, P., Stojanovic, L.: Consistent evolution of owl ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux-Modeling the Dynamic of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: On applying the agm theory to dls and owl. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Flouris, G., Huang, Z., Pan, J.Z., Plexousakis, D., Wache, H.: Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies. In: Proc. of AAAI 2006, pp. 1295–1300 (2006)
Schlobach, S., Huang, Z., Cornet, R., van Harmelen, F.: Debugging incoherent terminologies. J. Autom. Reasoning 39(3), 317–349 (2007)
Völker, J., Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y., Hotho, A.: Learning disjointness. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Ontology reasoning in the shoq(d) description logic. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2001, pp. 199–204 (2001)
Dalal, M.: Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: Preliminary report. In: Proc. of AAAI 1988, pp. 475–479 (1988)
Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: Owl web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. In: Technical report, W3C. W3C Recommendation (2004)
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, implementation and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Reducing belief revision to circumscription (and vice versa). Artif. Intell. 93, 261–296 (1997)
Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: Knowledge base revision in description logics. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4160, pp. 386–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Halaschek-Wiener, C., Katz, Y., Parsia, B.: Belief base revision for expressive description logics. In: Proc. of OWL-ED 2006 (2006)
Ribeiro, M.M., Wassermann, R.: Base revision in description logics - preliminary results. In: Proc. of IWOD 2007 (2007)
Qi, G., Haase, P., Huang, Z., Ji, Q., Pan, J.Z., Völker, J.: A kernel revision operator for terminologies - algorithms and evaluation. In: Proc. of ISWC 2008, pp. 419–434 (2008)
de Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R.: On the update of description logic ontologies at the instance level. In: Proc. of AAAI 2006 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, F., Qi, G., Huang, Z. (2009). A Distance-Based Operator to Revising Ontologies in DL \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\) . In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5590. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02905-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02906-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)