Skip to main content

Using Contextual Information for IDS Alarm Classification (Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment (DIMVA 2009)

Abstract

Signature-based intrusion detection systems are known to generate many noncritical alarms (alarms not related to a successful attack). Adding contextual information to IDSes is a promising avenue to identify noncritical alarms. Several approaches using contextual information have been suggested. However, it is not clear what are the benefits of using a specific approach. This paper establishes the effectiveness of using target configuration (i.e. operating system and applications) as contextual information for identifying noncritical alarms. Moreover, it demonstrates that current tools for OS discovery are not adequate for IDS context gathering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gagnon, F., Esfandiari, B., Bertossi, L.: A Hybrid Approach to Operating System Discovery Using Answer Set Programming. In: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Management (IM 2007), pp. 391–400 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gagnon, F., Massicotte, F., Esfandiari, B.: On the Effectiveness of Target Configuration as Contextual Information for IDS Alarm Classification. Technical Report SCE-08-08, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering - Carleton University (2008), http://www.sce.carleton.ca/~fgagnon/Publications/context.pdf

  3. Dayioglu, B., Ozgit, A.: Use of Passive Network Mapping to Enhance Signature Quality of Misuse Network Intrusion Detection Systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Computer and Information Science, ISCIS 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ettercap, http://ettercap.sourceforge.net

  5. Kruegel, C., Robertson, W.: Alert Verification: Determining the Success of Intrusion Attempts. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Detection of Intrusions and Malware and Vulnerability Assessment, DIMVA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lippmann, R.P., Fried, D.J., Graf, I., Haines, J.W., Kendall, K.R., McClung, D., Weber, D., Webster, S.E., Wyschogrod, D., Cunnigham, R.K., Zissman, M.A.: Evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems: The 1998 DARPA Off-line Intrusion Detection Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2000 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX 2000), vol. 2, pp. 12–26 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Massicotte, F., Gagnon, F., Couture, M., Labiche, Y., Briand, L.: Automatic Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McHugh, J.: Testing Intrusion Detection Systems: A critique of the 1998 and 1999 DARPA Intrusion Detection System Evaluation as Performed by Lincoln Laboratory. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 3(4), 262–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nmap, http://www.insecure.org/nmap/

  10. p0f, http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f.shtml

  11. Patton, S., Yurcik, W., Doss, D.: An Achilles’ Heel in Signature-Based IDS: Squealing False Positives in SNORT. In: Lee, W., Mé, L., Wespi, A. (eds.) RAID 2001. LNCS, vol. 2212, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Security Focus, http://www.securityfocus.org/

  13. SinFP, http://www.gomor.org/cgi-bin/sinfp.pl

  14. Singhal, A.: Modern Information Retrieval: A Brief Overview. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 24(4), 35–43 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siphon, http://siphon.datanerds.net/

  16. Sommer, R., Paxson, V.: Enhancing Byte-Level Network Intrusion Detection Signatures with Context. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2003), pp. 262–271 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wine, http://www.winehq.org

  18. Xprobe, http://xprobe.sourceforge.net

  19. Zhou, J., Carlson, A., Bishop, M.: Verify Results of Network Intrusion Alerts Using Lightweight Protocol Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gagnon, F., Massicotte, F., Esfandiari, B. (2009). Using Contextual Information for IDS Alarm Classification (Extended Abstract). In: Flegel, U., Bruschi, D. (eds) Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment. DIMVA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02918-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02918-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02917-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02918-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics