Skip to main content

Can Physicians Structure Clinical Guidelines? Experiments with a Mark-Up-Process Methodology

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Management for Health Care Procedures (K4HelP 2008)

Abstract

We have previously developed an architecture and a set of tools called the Digital electronic Guideline Library (DeGeL), which includes a web-based tool for structuring (marking-up) free-text clinical guidelines (GLs), namely, the URUZ Mark-up tool. In this study, we developed and evaluated a methodology and a tool for a mark-up-based specification and assessment of the quality of that specification, of procedural and declarative knowledge in clinical GLs. The methodology includes all necessary activities before, during and after the mark-up process, and supports specification and conversion of the GL’s free-text representation through semi-structured and semi-formal representations into a machine comprehensible representation. For the evaluation of this methodology, three GLs from different medical disciplines were selected. For each GL, as an indispensable step, an ontology-specific consensus was created, determined by a group of expert physicians and knowledge engineers, based on GL source. For each GL, two mark-ups in a chosen GL ontology (Asbru) were created by a distinct clinical editor; each of the clinical editors created a semi-formal mark-up of the GL using the URUZ tool. To evaluate each mark-up, a gold standard mark-up was created by collaboration of physician and knowledge engineer, and a specialized mark-up-evaluation tool was developed, which enables assessment of completeness, as well as of syntactic and semantic correctness of the mark-up. Subjective and objective measures were defined for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the correctness (soundness) and completeness of the marked-up knowledge, with encouraging results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grimshaw, J.M., Russel, I.T.: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342, 1317–1322 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tu, S.W., Musen, M.A.: A flexible approach to guideline modeling. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 420–424 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, P.D., Tu, S.W., Booth, N., Sugden, B., Purves, I.N.: Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care. In: Proc. AMIA Annu. Fall Symp., pp. 389–393 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boxwala, A.A., Peleg, M., Tu, S., et al.: GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J. Biomed. Inform. 37(3), 147–161 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton, D.R., Fox, J.: The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma guideline modelling language. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(5), 433–443 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Lanzola, G., Caporusso, V., Panzarasa, S.: Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artif. Intell. Med. 22, 65–80 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiffman, R.N., Karras, B.T., Agrawal, A., Chen, R., Marenco, L., Nath, S.: GEM: a proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(5), 488–498 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noy, N.F., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R.W., et al.: Protégé-2000: An Open-source Ontology-development and Knowledge-acquisition Environment. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., p. 953 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Votruba, P., Miksch, S., Kosara, R.: Facilitating knowledge maintenance of clinical guidelines and protocols. Medinfo. 11(Pt 1), 57–61 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ruzicka, M., Svatek, V.: Mark-up based analysis of narrative guidelines with the Stepper tool. Stud.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shahar, Y., Young, O., Shalom, E., Galperin, M., Mayaffit, A., Moskovitch, R., Hessing, A.: A Framework for a Distributed, Hybrid, Multiple-Ontology Clinical-Guideline Library and Automated Guideline-Support Tools. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 37(5), 325–344 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahar, Y., Miksch, S., Johnson, P.: The Asgaard project: A task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (14), 29–51 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., et al.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1), 52–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Clercq, P.A., Blom, J.A., Korsten, H.H., Hasman, A.: Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif. Intell. Med. 31(1), 1–27 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peleg, M., Gutnik, L., Snow, V., Patel, V.L.: Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics (2005) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, R.A., Waitman, L.R., Chen, S., Rosenbloom, S.T.: The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): Empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt. J. Biomed. Inform. 38(6), 469–485 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shalom, E., Shahar, Y., Lunenfeld, E., Taieb-Maimon, M., Young, O., Bar, G., et al.: The importance of creating an ontology-specific consensus before a markup-based specification of clinical guidelines. In: The 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI2006), the workshop on AI techniques in healthcare: evidence-based guidelines and protocols, Trento, Italy, August 29. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shalom, E., Shahar, Y., Taieb-Maimon, M., Lunenfeld, E.: A Quality Assessment Tool for Markup-Based Clinical Guidelines. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., Washington, DC, November 6, p. 1127 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) web site. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines (2002), http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5106a1.htm

  20. Inpatient Management of COPD: Emergency Room and Hospital Ward Management (B1), Veterans Affairs (VA) web site (2005), http://www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/COPD/copd_cpg/content/b1/annoB1.htm

  21. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Web site. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism (2002), http://www.aace.com/pub/pdf/guidelines/hypo_hyper.pdf

  22. Shalom, E.: An Evaluation of a methodology for Specification of Clinical Guidelines at Multiple Representation Levels. Master Thesis. 2006; Technical report No. 14942, Dpt. of Information Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shalom, E., Shahar, Y., Taieb-Maimon, M., Bar, G., Young, O.B., Martins, S., Vaszar, L., Liel, Y., Yarkoni, A.K., Goldstein, M., Leibowitz, A., Marom, T., Lunenfeld, E.: A Quantitative Evaluation of a Methodology for Collaborative Specification of Clinical Guidelines at Multiple Representation Levels. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41(6), 889–903 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatsek, A., Shahar, Y., Taieb-Maimon, M., Shalom, E., Dubi-sobol, A., Bar, G., et al.: A Methodological Specification of a Guideline for Diagnosis and Management of PreEclampsia. In: The 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008), Workshop on Knowledge Management for HealthCare Processes, Greece, July 21. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shalom, E. et al. (2009). Can Physicians Structure Clinical Guidelines? Experiments with a Mark-Up-Process Methodology. In: Riaño, D. (eds) Knowledge Management for Health Care Procedures. K4HelP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03262-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03262-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03261-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03262-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics