Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intangible Assets in a Polish Telecommunication Sector – Rough Sets Approach

  • Chapter
Transactions on Rough Sets X

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TRS,volume 5656))

  • 355 Accesses

Abstract

In this article, we present the results of a follow up study concentrated on the intangible assets and their role in the value creation process. As a result of the earlier investigation [47] we obtained two different groups of telecommunication companies. In the first group, we observed stable and continuous growth of the corporate value while in the second group this growth was insignificant and continually fluctuating. In order to obtain factors causing this discrepancy we decide to pursue further analysis. The present study used the data acquired through employee questionnaires sent to the analyzed companies. Using this data we constructed an Information System according to Pawlak and Slowinski [62], [50]. Next, we applied Rough Sets in order to differentiate these intangible assets (IA) which caused the aforementioned difference. Specifically, we focused on theoretical concepts of data reduction, quality of classification, accuracy of approximation, and core of the set. Consequently, we obtained a set of intangible assets which had the biggest impact on the value of analysed companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmad, F., Hamdan, A.R., Bakar, A.A.: Determining Success Indicators of E-Commerce Companies Using Rough Set Approach. The Journal of American Academy of Business (September 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn, B., Cho, S., Kim, Y.: The integrated methodology of rough set theory and artificial neural network for business failure prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 18 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andriessen, D.: The Financial Value of Intangibles, Searching For The Holy Grail. Paper Presented At The 5th World Congress on The Management of Intellectual Capital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, January 16-18 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arvidsson, S.: Demand and Supply of Information on Intangibles: The Case of Knowledge-Intense Companies, PhD Dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Finance, Lund University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banbura, J., Pruszczynska, B.: Jak zwiekszyc wartosc firmy- Value Based Management cz. I, Francuski Instytut Gospodarki, http://nowoczesnafirma.wp.pl/artykuly/artykul_5717.htm

  6. Baruch, L.: Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Brookings Institute Press, Washingthon (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernadette, L.: Intellectual Capital. CMA Magazine 72(1) (February 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beynon, M., Curry, B., Morgan, P.: Knowledge discovery in marketing - an approach through Rough Set Theory. European Journal of Marketing 35(7/8) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blair, M., Wallman, S.: Unseen Wealth: Report of the Brookings Task Force on Intangibles. The Brookings Institution, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boisot, M., Canals, A.: Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right. Journal of Evolutional Economics 14 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bianchi, P., Iorio, R., Labory, S., Malagoli, N.: EU Policies for Innovation and Knowledge Diffusion. WP3: Policy Implications of the Intangible Economy (University of Ferrara), PRISM work package 3; PRISM 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bontis, N.: Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(1) (March 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brooking, A., Motta, E.: A Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital and a Methodology for Auditing It. In: 17th Annual National Business Conference, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, January 24-26 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bukowitz, W., Petrash, G.: Visualizing, Measuring and Managing Knowledge. Research Technology Management 40(4), 08956308 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chouchoulas, A., Shen, Q.: Rough set-aided keyword reduction for text categorization. Applied Artificial Intelligence 15 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collins English Dictionary. Harper Collins Publishers, England (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Contractor, F.: Valuing Corporate Knowledge and Intangible Assets: Some General Principles. Knowledge and Process Management 7(4) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson, C.: Human Resource Accounting: From Prescription to Description. Management Decision 32(6) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dimitras, A., Slowinski, R., Susmaga, R., Zopounidis, C.: Business failure prediction using rough sets. European Journal of Operational Research 114 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dobija, D.: Pomiar i sprawozdawczosc kapitalu intelektualnego przedsiebiorstwa. WSPiZ, Warszawa (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edvinsson, L., Malone, M.: Kapital Intelektualny. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eustace, C.: The Intangible Economy Impact And Policy Issues, Report of the European High Level Expert, Group on the Intangible Economy, Enterprise Directorate-General, European Commission (October 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tay, F.E.H., Lixiang, S.: Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model. European Journal of Operational Research 141 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goh, C., Law, R.: Incorporating the rough sets theory into travel demand analysis. Tourism Management 24, 511–517 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gento, A.M., Redondo, A.: Rough sets and maintenance in a production line. Expert Systems 20(5) (November 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Extension of the Rough Set Approach to Multicriteria Decision Support. INFOR 38(3) (August 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hall, R.: The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal 13 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hassanien, A.: Intelligent Data Analysis of Breast Cancer Based on Rough Set Theory. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 12(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hejduk, I., Grudzewski, W.: Managing Corporate Value. In: Krupa, T. (ed.) New Challenges and Old Problems in Enterprise Management. Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hendriksen, E., van Breda, M.: Accounting Theory, 5th edn. Buridge, Irwin (1992); Dobija D.: Pomiar i sprawozdawczosc kapitalu intelektualnego przedsiebiorstwa, WSPiZ, Warszawa 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hill, P., Youngman, R.: Revisiting Intangibles - A Misnomer? PRISM WP5: Part 2 (February 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holtham, C., Youngman, R.: Measurement And Reporting of Intangibles - A European Policy Perspective, PRISM - Papers, Working Papers WP 2 (December 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hunter, L.: Intellectual Capital: Accumulation and Appropriation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 22/02 (November 2002), http://www.melbourneinstitute.com

  34. IAS 38, par 8, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) including International Accounting Standards (IASs) and Interpretations as at 1 January 2005, International Accounting Standards Board (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Intana, R., Mukaidono, M.: Generalization of Rough sets and its applications in information. Intelligent Data Analysis 6 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kyoung-jae, K., Ingoo, H.: The extraction of trading rules from stock market data using rough sets. Expert Systems 18(4) (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liang, J., Xu, Z.: The algorithm on knowledge reduction in incomplete information systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10(1) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johanson, U., Martensson, M., Skoog, M.: Measuring and Managing Intangibles; Eleven Swedish Qualitative Exploratory Case Studies. Paper presented at International Symposium: Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experience, Issues, and Prospects, Technical Meeting, Amsterdam, June 9-10 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kurz, P.: Intellectual capital management and value maximization. Technology, Law and Insurance (5) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee, S., Vachtsevanos, G.: An application of rough set theory to defect detection of automotive glass. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 60 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lenain, P., Paltridge, S.: After The Telecommunications Bubble, OECD Economic Outlook (73) (May 2003), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/37/2635431.pdf pazdziernik 2005

  43. Lev, B.: Intangibles - Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lia, Y., Zhang, C., Swan, J.: An information filtering model on the Web and its application in Job Agent. Knowledge-Based Systems 13 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lowendahl, B.: Strategic Management of Professional Service Firm. In: Di Tommaso, M., Paci, D., Schweitzer, S. (eds.) Copenhagen, Handelshojskolens Forlag 1997, The Geography of Intangibles, op. cit. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Maciocha, A.: Intellectual Capital Versus Intangible Assets - the Differences and Similarities. In: Conference proceedings, IC-Congress 2007, INHOLLAND University of professional education, Haarlem, The Netherlands, May 3-4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Maciocha, A., Kisielnicki, J.: Kapital Intelektualny problemy pomiaru - studium na przykladzie sektora telekomunikacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. MACMILLAN English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mak, B., Munkata, T.: Rule Extraction from expert heuristics: A comparative study of rough sets with neural networks and ID3. European Journal of Operational Research 136 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Martinem, I., Perez, R.: Making decision in case-based systems using probabilities and rough sets. Knowledge-Based Systems 16, 205–213 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McKee, T.: Developing a Bankruptcy Prediction Model via Rough Sets Theory. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 9 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Measuring the Future: The Value Creation Index. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Center For Business Innovation Report (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Meskens, N., Levecq, P., Lebon, F.: Multivariate analysis and rough sets: Two approaches for software-quality analysis. International Transaction in Operational Research 9 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ju-Sheng, M., Wei-Zhi, W., Wen-Xiu, Z.: Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model. Information Sciences 159 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mrózek, A., Plonka, L.: Analiza danych metoda zbiorów przyblizonych - Zastosowanie w ekonomii, medycynie i sterowaniu. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza PLJ, Warszawa (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nally, D.: Reinwenting Corporate Reporting. PriceWaterhauseCoopers’ report (May 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G.: Food security and agricultural sustainability: an overview of critical success factors. Environmental Management and Health 13(5) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets and decision analysis. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets and decision analysis. INFOR 38(3) (August 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pawlak, Z.: Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support. European Journal of Operational Research 99, 48–57

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rudiments of rough sets. Information Sciences (177) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R.: Decision Analysis Using Rough Sets. International Transaction Operational Research 1(1) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  63. The New Penguin English Dictionary. Penguin Books, England (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pheng, L.S., Hongbin, J.: Analysing ownership, locational and internalization advantages of Chinese construction MNCs using roughsets analysis. Construction Management and Economics (24), 1149–1165 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pitkänen, A.: The importance of intellectual capital for organizational performance. A research proposal for Ph.D. thesis, presented at the national doctorial tutorial for accounting in Lappeenranta, 19,20.I (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Reilly, R.: Valuation of intangible assets for bankruptcy and reorganization purposes. Ohio CPA Journal 53(4) (August 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Richards, D., Compton, P.: An alternative verification and validation technique for an alternative knowledge representation and acquisition technique. Knowledge-Based Systems 12 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Salonen, H., Nurmi, H.: Theory and Methodology. A note on rough sets and common knowledge events. European Journal of Operational Research 112 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shen, L., Loh, H.T.: Applying rough sets to market timing decisions. Decision Support Systems 37(4) (September 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Słowiński, R., Zopounidis, C., Dimitras, A.: Prediction of company acquisition in Greece by means of the rough set approach. European Journal of Operational Research 100 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  71. http://idss.cs.put.poznan.pl/site/software.html

  72. Smith, P.: Systemic Knowledge Management: Managing Organizational Assets For Competitive Advantage. Journal of Systemic Knowledge Management (April 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Steward, G.: The Quest for Value. A Guide for Senior Managers. Harper Business (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stolowy, H., Jeny, A.: How accounting standards approach and classify intangibles - an international survey. Paper prepared for presentation at the 22nd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Bordeaux, France, May 5-7 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sveiby, K.: The Invisible Balance Sheet: Key indicator for accounting control and valuation of know-how companies. The Konrad Group, Suecia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sveiby, K.: The New Organizational Wealth - Managing & Measuring Intangible Assets. Berret Koehler (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tan, H., Plowman, D., Hancock, P.: Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies: an Exploration of the Pulic Model, http://www.handels.gu.se/eaa2005/Paper_Poster_database/All_papers/FRG041.doc

  78. Tay, F., Shen, L.: Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model Computing, Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology. European Journal of Operational Research 141 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Teece, D.: Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context. Long Range Planning 33, 200; in: Intellectual Capital: Accumulation and Appropriation, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Di Tommaso, M., Paci, D., Schweitzer, S.: The Geography of Intangibles. Paper prepared for the 3rd PRISM Forum, Copenhagen, September 19-20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ulf, J.: Why the concept of human resource costing and accounting does not work; A lesson form seven Swedish cases. Personnel Review 28(1/2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ulmer, M.: Latest research on the valuation of intellectual capital: Models, methods and their evaluation. Doctoral seminar in Corporate Finance, Summer semester (June 27, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wagner, C.: Making intangible assets more tangible, The Futurist; Washington (May/June 2001); in: Holtham C., Youngman R.: Measurement And Reporting of Intangibles - A European Policy Perspective, PRISM - Papers, Working Papers WP 2 (December 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Jinn-Tsai, W., Yi-Shih, C.: Rough set approach for accident chains exploration. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39, 629–637 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Youngman, R.: Managing and Measuring Intangibles: A Multi-Disciplinary Challenge. World Corporate Finance Review 2(11) (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zambon, S.: Accounting, Intangibles and Intellectual Capital: an overview of the issues and some considerations. WP4: Accounting, Audit, and Financial Analysis in the New Economy, PRISM/RESCUE, First Report (April 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ziarko, W.: Discovery through Rough Set Theory. Communications of the ACM 42(11) (November 1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dublin Institute of Technology, Aungier Street, Dublin, Ireland

    Agnieszka Maciocha & Jerzy Kisielnicki

  2. The University of Warsaw, Szturmowa 1/3, 02-678, Warszawa, Poland

    Agnieszka Maciocha & Jerzy Kisielnicki

Authors
  1. Agnieszka Maciocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerzy Kisielnicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Winnipeg, University of Manitoba, R3T 5V6, Manitoba, Canada

    James F. Peters

  2. Institute of Mathematics, Warsaw University, Banacha 2, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland

    Andrzej Skowron

  3. Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 4, 20-031, Lublin, Poland

    Marcin Wolski

  4. University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India

    Mihir K. Chakraborty

  5. Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhejiang, P.R. China

    Wei-Zhi Wu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maciocha, A., Kisielnicki, J. (2009). Intangible Assets in a Polish Telecommunication Sector – Rough Sets Approach. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Wolski, M., Chakraborty, M.K., Wu, WZ. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets X. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5656. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03281-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03281-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03280-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03281-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation