Abstract
Electronic voting technologies have been quite widely deployed in a number of democracies. In the US for example, approximately 30% of the electorate used Direct Recorded Electronic (DRE) machines in the 2004 and 2008 presidential election. These systems have come in for significant criticism leading many experts to conclude that all digital technology used in voting must be flawed. While these critiques are fully justified and documented, to conclude that all voting technology must be irredeemably flawed is not in our view justified. The purpose of this note is to argue that, while it is undoubtedly true that careless introduction of information technology can undermine democracy, high assurance, verifiable voting schemes do exist and are worthy of serious consideration. Furthermore, such verifiable schemes can provide higher levels of trustworthiness than traditional pencil and paper, hand counting systems. The challenge remains to convince the various stakeholders of the trustworthiness of such schemes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beneloh, J., Tuinstra, D.: Receipt-free secret-ballot elections. In: Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 544–553. ACM, New York (1994)
Chaum, D.: Untraceable mail, return addresses and digital pseudonyms. Communications of the ACM 24(2), 84–88 (1981)
Chaum, D.: Secret-ballot receipts: True voter-verifiable elections. IEEE Security and Privacy 2(1), 38–47 (2004)
Chaum, D., Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.: A practical, voter-verifiable election scheme. In: di Vimercati, S.d.C., Syverson, P.F., Gollmann, D. (eds.) ESORICS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3679, pp. 118–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Chaum, D., et al.: Scantegrity II: End-to-End Verifiability for Optical Scan Election Systems using Invisible Ink Confirmation Codes. Technical report. In: Proceedings of USENIX-ACCURATE EVT (2008)
Gumbel, A.: Steal this vote! Nation Books (2005)
Jones, D.W.: A brief illustrated history of voting (2003), http://www.cs.uiowa.edo/~jones/voting/pictures
Jones, D.W.: Threats to voting systems (2005), http://vote.nist.gov/threats/papers/threatstovotingsystems.pdf
Juels, A., Catalano, D., Jakobsson, M.: Coercion-resistant Electronic Elections. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (November 2005)
Kohno, T., Stubblefield, A., Rubin, A.D., Wallach, D.S.: Analysis of an electronic voting system. In: Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)
Mercuri, R.: A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum Online (October 2002)
Neff, A.: A verifiable secret shuffle and its application to e-voting. In: Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 116–125. ACM, New York (2001)
Rivest, R.L.: The three ballot voting system (2006), http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/Rivest-TheThreeBallotVotingSystem.pdf
Rivest, R.L., Wack, J.P.: On the notion of “software independence” in voting systems. Transactions of the Royal Society (2008)
Ryan, P.Y.A.: Towards a dependability case for the chaum voting scheme. In: DIMACS Workshop on Electronic Voting – Theory and Practice (2004)
Ryan, P.Y.A.: A variant of the chaum voting scheme. Technical Report CS-TR-864, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (2004)
Ryan, P.Y.A.: A variant of the chaum voting scheme. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Issues in the Theory of Security, pp. 81–88. ACM, New York (2005)
Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.: Prêt à Voter with Re-encryption Mixes. In: Gollmann, D., Meier, J., Sabelfeld, A. (eds.) ESORICS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4189, pp. 313–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Schneier, B.: Election fraud in kentucky (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ryan, P.Y.A. (2009). How Many Election Officials Does It Take to Change an Election?. In: Degano, P., Viganò, L. (eds) Foundations and Applications of Security Analysis. ARSPA-WITS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5511. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03459-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03459-6_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03458-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03459-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)