Skip to main content

Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to Network Selection

  • Conference paper
Mobile Lightweight Wireless Systems (Mobilight 2009)

Abstract

In a heterogeneous wireless network environment services are ubiquitously delivered over multiple wireless access technologies. Ranking of the alternatives and selection of the most efficient and suitable access network to meet the QoS requirements of a specific service, as these are defined by the user, constitutes thus an important issue. Decisions on which network to connect to are however difficult to be reached, since multiple factors of different relative importance have to be taken into consideration. This paper addresses this difficulty by adopting Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) methods. Fuzzy AHP, a MADM method, is initially applied to determine the weights of certain Quality of Service indicators that act as the criteria impacting the decision process. The fuzzy extension of the method, and consequently the use of fuzzy numbers, is adopted in order to incorporate the existence of fuzziness as a result of subjective evaluations. Afterwards, ELECTRE, a ranking MADM method, is applied to rank the alternatives, in this case wireless networks, based on their overall performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dang, M.S., Prakash, A., Anvekar, D.K., et al.: Fuzzy logic based handoff in wireless networks. In: 2000 IEEE 51st VTC 2000-Spring, Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, Tokyo, May 2000, vol. 3, pp. 2375–2379 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kher, S., Somani, A.K., Gupta, R.: Network selection using fuzzy logic. Broadband Networks

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, Y., Yong, B., Lan, C.: Utility dependent network selection using MADM in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 18th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Markaki, O., Charilas, D., Nikitopoulos, D.: Enhancing Quality of Experience in Next Generation Networks through Network Selection Mechanisms. In: Mobile Terminal Assisted Enhanced Services Provisioning in a B3G Environment Workshop, PIMRC (September 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charilas, D., Markaki, O., Nikitopoulos, D., Theologou, M.: Packet-Switched Network Selection with the Highest QoS in 4G Networks. Elsevier Computer Networks 52(1), 248–258 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, W.: Handover Decision Using Fuzzy MADM in Heterogeneous Networks. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2004) (March 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Song, Q., Jamalipour, A.: Network Selection in an integrated Wireless LAN and UMTS Environment Using Mathematical Modeling and Computing Techniques. IEEE Personal Communications 12(3), 42–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Song, Q., Jamalipour, A.: A Network Selection Mechanism for Next Generation Networks. In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Communications. ICC 2005, May 16-20, vol. 2, pp. 1418–1422 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bari, F., Leung, V.: Application of ELECTRE to Network Selection in a Hetereogeneous Wireless Network Environment. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty, T.L.: Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors - The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics 102(2), 251–318 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Douligeris, C., Pereira, I.: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach to the Analysis of Quality in Telecommunication Systems (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mikhailov, L., Tsvetinov, P.: Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: Applied Soft Computing 2004, vol. 5, pp. 23–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., Zaeri, M.S.: Project Selection by Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Technique. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, October 2007, vol. 24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charilas, D.E., Markaki, O.I., Psarras, J., Constantinou, P. (2009). Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to Network Selection. In: Granelli, F., Skianis, C., Chatzimisios, P., Xiao, Y., Redana, S. (eds) Mobile Lightweight Wireless Systems. Mobilight 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03819-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03819-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03818-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03819-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics