Skip to main content

On Decomposing Knapsack Constraints for Length-Lex Bounds Consistency

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2009 (CP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5732))

Abstract

The length-lex representation for set variables orders all subsets of a given universe of values according to cardinality and lexicography. To achieve length-lex bounds consistency for Knapsack constraints it has been proposed to decompose the constraint into two sum constraints. We provide theoretical and practical evidence which shows that decomposition increases the problem of computing a fixpoint which is intrinsic to the length-lex representation: 1. The fixpoint problem for this domain representation is NP-hard in general. 2. For a tractable sub-family of Knapsack decomposition takes more time than exponential brute-force enumeration. 3. Experimental results on decomposed Knapsack constraints show that exponential-time fixpoint computation is the rule and not some pathological exception.

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the Career: Cornflower Project (award number 0644113).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bordeaux, L., Hamadi, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: An Analysis of Slow Convergence in Interval Propagation. In: CP, pp. 790–797 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cornuejols, G., Dawande, M.: A Class of Hard Small 0-1 Program. In: IPCO, pp. 284–293 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gervet, C., Van Hentenryck, P.: Length-lex ordering for set CSPs. In: AAAI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Malitsky, Y., Sellmann, M., van Hoeve, W.-J.: Length-Lex Bounds Consistency for Knapsack Constraints. In: Stuckey, P.J. (ed.) CP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5202, pp. 266–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Sellmann, M.: The Practice of Approximated Consistency for Knapsack Constraints. In: AAAI, pp. 179–184 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trick, M.: A Dynamic Programming Approach for Consistency and Propagation for Knapsack Constraints. In: CPAIOR, pp. 113–124 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yip, J., Van Hentenryck, P.: Length-Lex Bound Consistency for Knapsack Constraints. In: ACM SAC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sellmann, M. (2009). On Decomposing Knapsack Constraints for Length-Lex Bounds Consistency. In: Gent, I.P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2009. CP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5732. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_59

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04243-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04244-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics