Skip to main content

Brief Announcement: Weak Synchrony Models and Failure Detectors for Message Passing (k-)Set Agreement

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing (DISC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5805))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 750 Accesses

Abstract

Motivation. In recent years, the quest for weak system assumptions, which add just enough synchrony resp. failure information to purely asynchronous systems to circumvent impossibility results, has been an active research topic in distributed computing. Most work in this area has been devoted to (1) identifying weak(est) failure detectors (FDs), and (2) identifying synchrony assumptions just strong enough to implement these weak FDs.

Due to the FLP impossibility result [1], the first focus of this research has been the consensus problem. More recently, k-set agreement (termed set agreement for k = n−1) has been identified as a promising target for further exploring the solvability border in asynchronous systems. As for (1), anti- \({\it \Omega}\) [2] was shown to be the weakest FD for set agreement in shared memory systems: Whereas \({\it \Omega}\) (the weakest FD for solving consensus [3]) outputs the id of one correct process infinitely often, anti-\({\it \Omega}\) outputs the id of one correct process only finitely often. Subsequently, a generalization called anti-\({\it \Omega}_k\) that returns nk processes has been shown to be the weakest FD for k-set agreement in shared memory system [4,5]. For message passing systems, only the weakest FD for set agreement is known, namely, the “loneliness” failure detector \(\cal{L}\) [6]. Concerning (2), a class of shared memory models for implementing anti-\({\it \Omega}_k\) was presented in [7].

This research was supported by the Austrian BM:vit’s FIT-IT programme (proj. no. 812205) and by Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) (proj. no. P20529).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. JACM 32, 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zieliński, P.: Automatic classification of eventual failure detectors. In: Pelc, A. (ed.) DISC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4731, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra, T.D., Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: The weakest failure detector for solving consensus. JACM 43(4), 685–722 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gafni, E., Kuznetsov, P.: The weakest failure detector for solving k-set agreement. In: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delporte Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Tielmann, A.: Brief announcement: The Disagreement Power of an Adversary. In: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Tielmann, A.: The weakest failure detector for message passing set-agreement. In: Taubenfeld, G. (ed.) DISC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5218, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Aguilera, M.K., Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Toueg, S.: Partial synchrony based on set timeliness. In: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2009 (to appear, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biely, M., Robinson, P., Schmid, U.: Weak synchrony models and failure detectors for message passing (k-)set agreement. Research Report 182-51/2009, Inst. f. technische Informatik, TU Wien (2009), http://www.vmars.tuwien.ac.at/php/pserver/docdetail.php?DID=2657&viewmode=paper

  9. Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Unreliable failure detectors with limited scope accuracy and an application to consensus. In: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 329–340 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biely, M., Robinson, P., Schmid, U. (2009). Brief Announcement: Weak Synchrony Models and Failure Detectors for Message Passing (k-)Set Agreement. In: Keidar, I. (eds) Distributed Computing. DISC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5805. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04355-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04355-0_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04354-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04355-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics