Skip to main content

Combining Consistency and Confidentiality Requirements in First-Order Databases

  • Conference paper
Information Security (ISC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5735))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a logical setting, consistency of a database instance with constraints is a fundamental requirement. We show how satisfaction of a set of constraints guarantees confidentiality of some information declared secret by a security policy – albeit at the cost of some modified database entries. We identify a very general class of constraints for which this problem is effectively and in many cases efficiently solvable by means of an automatic procedure. A distance minimization ensures maximal availability of correct database entries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Galinovic, A., Antoncic, V.: Polyinstantiation in relational databases with multilevel security. In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 127–132. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jukic, N., Nestorov, S., Vrbsky, S.V., Parrish, A.S.: Enhancing database access control by facilitating non-key related cover stories. Journal of Database Management 16(3), 1–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuppens, F., Gabillon, A.: Cover story management. Data & Knowledge Engineering 37(2), 177–201 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandhu, R.S., Jajodia, S.: Polyinstantation for cover stories. In: Second ESORICS. In: Deswarte, Y., Quisquater, J.-J., Eizenberg, G. (eds.) ESORICS 1992. LNCS, vol. 648, pp. 307–328. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, K., Winslett, M.: Entity modeling in the MLS relational model. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 199–210. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stouppa, P., Studer, T.: Data privacy for knowledge bases. In: Artemov, S., Nerode, A. (eds.) LFCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5407, pp. 409–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P.G., Miller, R.J., Popa, L.: Data exchange: semantics and query answering. Theoretical Computer Science 336(1), 89–124 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chomicki, J.: Consistent query answering: Five easy pieces. In: Schwentick, T., Suciu, D. (eds.) ICDT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4353, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Biskup, J., Wiese, L.: Preprocessing for controlled query evaluation with availability policy. Journal of Computer Security 16(4), 477–494 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biskup, J., Bonatti, P.A.: Controlled query evaluation with open queries for a decidable relational submodel. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 50(1-2), 39–77 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Winslett, M.: Updating Logical Databases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Gelder, A., Topor, R.W.: Safety and translation of relational calculus queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 16, 235–278 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Biskup, J., Burgard, D.M., Weibert, T., Wiese, L.: Inference control in logic databases as a constraint satisfaction problem. In: McDaniel, P., Gupta, S.K. (eds.) ICISS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4812, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Tadros, C., Wiese, L.: Using SAT solvers to compute inference-proof database instances (submitted, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, C.L., Lee, R.C.T.: Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, London (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hull, R., Su, J.: Domain independence and the relational calculus. Acta Informatica 31(6), 513–524 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciriani, V., De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Foresti, S., Jajodia, S., Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P.: Fragmentation and encryption to enforce privacy in data storage. In: Biskup, J., López, J. (eds.) ESORICS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4734, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biskup, J., Wiese, L. (2009). Combining Consistency and Confidentiality Requirements in First-Order Databases. In: Samarati, P., Yung, M., Martinelli, F., Ardagna, C.A. (eds) Information Security. ISC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5735. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04474-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04474-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04473-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04474-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics