Abstract
The interaction of proof search and counterexample search is at the heart of recent methods in decision procedures model checking. In this talk, we’ll consider the relation between these methods and test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)
Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. J. ACM 50(5), 752–794 (2003)
Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: DART: directed automated random testing. In: PLDI 2005, pp. 213–223. ACM, New York (2005)
McMillan, K.L.: An interpolating theorem prover. Theor. Comput. Sci. 345(1), 101–121 (2005)
McMillan, K.L.: Lazy abstraction with interpolants. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) CAV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 123–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
McMillan, K.L. (2009). What’s in Common between Test, Model Checking, and Decision Procedures?. In: Alpuente, M., Cook, B., Joubert, C. (eds) Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. FMICS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5825. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04570-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04570-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04569-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04570-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)