Skip to main content

Abstract

Nowadays, software organizations have needed to develop excellent and reliable products. This scenario has helped to increase the relevance of quality assurance activities, especially the testing discipline. However, sometimes the time and resources are limited and not all tests can be executed, demanding organizations to decide what use cases should be tested, to guarantee the predictability of the project’s time and budget.The multiple criteria methodologies support decisions, considering many factors, not only professional experience. This paper presents a multiple criteria model to support the decision of selecting the use cases that should be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bana, Costa, C.A., Beinat, E., Vickerman, R.: Model-structuring and impact assessment: qualitative analysis of policy attractiveness. CEG-IST Working Paper n.25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandeira, L.R.P.: Product Quality from Test Automation: a Case Study. Monograph to obtain the B.Sc in Computer Science Title, University of the Ceara State (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Craig, R.D., Jaskiel, S.P.: Systematic Software Testing. Artech House Publishers, Boston (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunha, J.A.O.: Decisius: Um Processo de Apoio à Decisão e sua Aplicação na Definição de um Índice de Produtividade para Projetos de Software, Dissertation of M.Sc., CIN/UFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dias, A.: Introduction to Software Testing. Magazine of Software Engineering, on-line (2007), http://www.devmedia.com.br/esm

  6. Flament, M.: Multiple Criteria Glossary. Red Iberoamericana de Evaluación y Decisión Multicritério, Espanha (1999), http://www.unesco.org.uy/redm/glosariom.htm

  7. Gonçalves, F.M.G.S., Donegan, P.M., Castro, A.K., Pinheiro, P.R., Carvalho, A., Belchior, A.D.: Multi-criteria Model for Selection of Automated System Tests. In: The IFIP International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Viena. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pinheiro, P.R., Castro, A., Pinheiro, M.: A Multicriteria Model Applied in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease: A Bayesian Network. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, July 2008, pp. 15–22 (2008), doi:10.1109/CSE.2008.44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marilia, M., Carvalho, A.L., Furtado, M.E.S., Pinheiro, P.R.: A co-evolutionary interaction design of digital TVapplications based on verbal decision analysis of user experiences. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism (IJDCET) 1, 312–324 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marilia, M., Carvalho, A.L., Furtado, M.E.S., Pinheiro, P.R.: Co-evolutionary Interaction Design of Digital TV Applications Based on Verbal Decision Analysis of User Experiences. In: WSKS 2008, vol. 19, pp. 702–711 (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87783-7

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meskens, N., Roubens, M. (eds.): Advances in Decision Analysis. Book Series: Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 131–157. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira, J.M.M., Oliveira, K.B., Castro, A.K., Pinheiro, P.R., Belchior, A.D.: Application of Multi-Criteria to Perform an Organizational Measurement Process. In: Elleithy, K. (ed.) Advances and Innovations in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, pp. 247–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinheiro, P.R., Souza, G.G.C., Castro, A.K.A.: Structuring of the Multicriteria Problem for the Production of Journal. Pesqui. Oper. 28(2), 203–216 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evangelou, C., Karacapilidis, N., Khaled, O.A.: Interweaving knowledge management, argumentation and decision making in a collaborative setting: the KAD ontology model. Int. J. of Knowledge and Learning 2005 1(1/2), 130–145 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, A., Pinheiro, P.R., Rodrigues, M.M., Albuquerque, A.B., Gonçalves, F.M. (2009). Towards the Selection of Testable Use Cases and a Real Experience. In: Lytras, M.D., Ordonez de Pablos, P., Damiani, E., Avison, D., Naeve, A., Horner, D.G. (eds) Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All. WSKS 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 49. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04757-2_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04757-2_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04756-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04757-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics