Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5799))

  • 755 Accesses

Introduction

Circuit-level verification is a promising area for formal methods research. Simulation using tools such as SPICE remains the main method for circuit validation. Increasing integration densities have increased the prevalence of analog/mixed-signal designs. It is now common for analog components such as DLLs and phase correction circuits to be embedded deep in digital designs, making the circuits critical for chip functional yet hard to test. While digital design flows have benefited from systematic methodologies including the use of formal methods, circuit design remains an art. As a consequence, analog design errors account for a growing percentage of design re-spins. All of these have created a pressing need for better circuit-level CAD and motivated a strong interest in formal verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurshan, R., McMillan, K.: Analysis of digital circuits through symbolic reduction. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design 10(11), 1356–1371 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartong, W., Hedrich, L., Barke, E.: Model checking algorithms for analog verification. In: Proceedings of the 39th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 2002, pp. 542–547 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Little, S., Seegmiller, N., Walter, D., Myers, C., Yoneda, T.: Verification of analog/mixed-signal circuits using labeled hybrid petri nets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Aided Design, November 2006, pp. 275–282 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frehse, G.: PHAVer: Algorithmic verification of hybrid systems past HyTech. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 258–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch, M.W., Smale, S.: Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. Academic Press, San Diego (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, S., Krogh, B.H., Rutenbar, R.A.: Towards formal verification of analog designs. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, November 2004, pp. 210–217 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frehse, G., Krogh, B.H., Rutenbar, R.A.: Verifying analog oscillator circuits using forward/backward abstraction refinement. In: Proceedings of Design Automation and Test Europe, March 2006, pp. 257–262 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell, I., Greenstreet, M.: Proving Newtonian arbiters correct, almost surely. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Designing Correct Circuits, Båstad, Sweden (September 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenstreet, M.R., Huang, X.: A smooth dynamical system that counts in binary. In: Proceedings of the 1997 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Hong Kong, vol. II, pp. 977–980. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenstreet, M.R., Mitchell, I.: Integrating projections. In: Henzinger, T.A., Sastry, S. (eds.) HSCC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1386, pp. 159–174. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, K.D., Kim, J., Konrad, V.: Some “real world” problems in the analog and mixed-signal domains. In: Proc. Workshop on Designing Correct Circuits (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenstreet, M.R., Yang, S.: Verifying start-up conditions for a ring oscillator. In: Proceedings of the 18th Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI (GLSVLSI 2008), May 2008, pp. 201–206 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Little, S., Myers, C.: Abstract modeling and simulation aided verification of analog/mixed-signal circuits. Presented at the 2008 Workshop on Formal Verification for Analog Circuits (FAC 2008) (July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tiwari, S.K., Gupta, A., et al.: fSpice: a boolean satisfiability based approach for formally verifying analog circuits. Presented at the 2008 Workshop on Formal Verification for Analog Circuits (FAC 2008) (July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zaki, M.H., Mitchell, I., Greenstreet, M.R.: Towards a formal analysis of DC equilibria of analog designs. Presented at the 2009 Workshop on Formal Verification for Analog Circuits (FAC 2009) (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fränzle, M., Herde, C., Ratschan, S., Schubert, T., Teige, T.: Efficient solving of large non-linear arithmetic constraint systems with complex boolean structure. JSAT Special Issue on Constraint Programming and SAT 1, 209–236 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saleh, R., Wilton, S., H̃u, A.J., Greenstreet, S.M., Ivanov, A., Lemieux, G., Pande, P., Grecu, C.: System-on-chip: Reuse and integration. Proceedings of the IEEE 94(6), 1050–1069 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaney, T., Molnar, C.: Anomalous behavior of synchronizer and arbiter circuits. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-22(4), 421–422 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurtado, M.: Structure and Performance of Asymptotically Bistable Dynamical Systems. PhD thesis, Sever Institute, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marino, L.: General theory of metastable operation. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-30(2), 107–115 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mendler, M., Stroup, T.: Newtonian arbiters cannot be proven correct. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Workshop on Designing Correct Circuits (January 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kinniment, D., Heron, K., Russell, G.: Measuring deep metastability. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems, March 2006, pp. 2–11 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, S., Greenstreet, M.R.: Computing synchronizer failure probabilities. In: Proceedings of the 13th Design, Automation and Test, Europe Conference, April 2007, pp. 1361–1366 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, S., Greenstreet, M.R.: Simulating improbable events. In: Proceedings of the 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, June 2007, pp. 154–157 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones, I.W., Yang, S., Greenstreet, M.: Synchronizer behavior and analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifthteenth International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems, May 2009, pp. 119–126 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dastidar, T., Chakrabarti, P.: A verification system for transient response of analog circuits using model checking. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSID 2005), January 2005, pp. 195–200 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yan, C., Greenstreet, M.R.: Verifying an arbiter circuit. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD 2008) (November 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brockett, R.: Smooth dynamical systems which realize arithmetical and logical operations. In: Nijmeijer, H., Schumacher, J.M. (eds.) Three Decades of Mathematical Systems Theory: A Collection of Surveys at the Occasion of the 50th Birthday of J. C. Willems. LNCIS, vol. 135, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yan, C., Greenstreet, M.R.: Circuit level verification of a high-speed toggle. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD 2007) (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bowman, K.A., Duvall, S.G., Meindl, J.D.: Impact of die-to-die and within-die parameter fluctuations on the maximum clock frequency distribution for gigascale integration. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 37(2), 183–190 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tschanz, J., Kao, J., et al.: Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 37(11), 1396–1402 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, T., Naffziger, S.: Comparison of adaptive body bias (ABB) and adaptive supply voltage (ASV) for improving delay and leakage under the presence of process variation. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems 11(5), 888–899 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naffziger, S., Stackhouse, B., et al.: The implementation of a 2-core, multi-threaded Itanium family processor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 41(1), 197–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kundert, K.S.: The Designer’s Guide to Verilog-AMS. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greenstreet, M.R. (2009). Verifying VLSI Circuits. In: Liu, Z., Ravn, A.P. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5799. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04760-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04761-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics