Skip to main content

Formalizing Linguistic Conventions for Conceptual Models

  • Conference paper
Book cover Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009 (ER 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5829))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A precondition for the appropriate analysis of conceptual models is not only their syntactic correctness but also their semantic comparability. Assuring comparability is challenging especially when models are developed by different persons. Empirical studies show that such models can vary heavily, especially in model element naming, even if they express the same issue. In contrast to most ontology-driven approaches proposing the resolution of these differences ex-post, we introduce an approach that avoids naming differences in conceptual models already during modeling. Therefore we formalize naming conventions combining domain thesauri and phrase structures based on a lin-guistic grammar. This allows for guiding modelers automatically during the modeling process using standardized labels for model elements. Our approach is generic, making it applicable for any modeling language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys 18(4), 323–364 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrence, R., Barker, K.: Integrating Relational Database Schemas using a Standardized Dictionary. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on Applied computing (SAC), Las Vegas (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadar, I., Soffer, P.: Variations in conceptual modeling: classification and ontological analysis. Journal of the AIS 7(8), 568–592 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Phalp, K., Shepperd, M.: Quantitative analysis of static models of processes. Journal of Systems and Software 52(2-3), 105–112 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., Majeed, B.: Business process analysis and optimization: beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 38(1), 69–82 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M.: A Methodology for Data Schema Integration in the Entity Rela-tionship Model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(6), 650–663 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargava, H.K., Kimbrough, S.O., Krishnan, R.: Unique Name Violations, a Problem for Model Integration or You Say Tomato, I Say Tomahto. ORSA Journal on Computing 3(2), 107–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, P.P.-S.: The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, Trento, pp. 3–15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L., Saccá, D.: An ontology-driven process modeling framework. In: Galindo, F., Takizawa, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) DEXA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3180, pp. 13–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Born, M., Dörr, F., Weber, I.: User-friendly semantic annotation in business process mod-eling. In: Weske, M., Hacid, M.-S., Godart, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Human-Friendly Service Description, Discovery and Matchmaking (Hf-SDDM 2007). 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2007), Nancy, pp. 260–271 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. White, S.A., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide. Understanding and Using BPMN. Lighthouse Point (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Höfferer, P.: Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In: Österle, H., Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007), St. Gallen, pp. 1620–1631 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring Similarity between Semantic Busi-ness Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM) 2007, Ballarat (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Ontology Based Business Process Description. In: Enter-prise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability, Proceedings of the Open Interop Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability, Co-located with CAiSE 2005 Conference, Porto (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sabetzadeh, M., Nejati, S., Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M.: A Relationship-Driven Frame-work for Model Merging. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling in Software Engi-neering. 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, Minneapolis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosemann, M.: Complexity Management in Process Models. Language-specific Modelling Guidelines [in German: Komplexitätsmanagement in Prozeßmodellen. Methodenspezifische Gestaltungsempfehlungen für die Informationsmodellierung], Wiesbaden (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kugeler, M.: Organisational Design with Conceptual Models. Modelling Conventions and Reference Process Model for Business Process Reengineering [in German: Informa-tionsmodellbasierte Organisationsgestaltung. Modellierungskonventionen und Referenzvorgehensmodell zur prozessorientierten Reorganisation], Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosemann, M.: Preparation of Process Modeling. In: Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Process Management – A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, Berlin, pp. 41–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rizopoulos, N., Mçbrien, P.: A General Approach to the Generation of Conceptual Model Transformations. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bögl, A., Kobler, M., Schrefl, M.: Knowledge Acquisition from EPC Models for Extraction of Process Patterns in Engineering Domains. In: Proceedings of the Multi-Conference on Information Systems [in German: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik] 2008 (MKWI 2008), Munich (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS – Business Process Modelling, 3rd edn., Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmid, H.: Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on New Methods in Natural Language Processing, Manchester, pp. 44–49 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Re-search. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan, R.M.: Syntax. In: Mitkov, R. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of computational lin-guistics, Oxford, pp. 70–90 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Automotive Thesaurus, http://automotivethesaurus.com

  29. Tradeport – Reference Library for Global Trade, http://tradeport.org/library

  30. WWW Virtual Library: Logistics, http://logisticsworld.com/logistics/glossary.htm

  31. ISO: ISO/TC97/SC5/WG3: Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, Ł., Stein, A. (2009). Formalizing Linguistic Conventions for Conceptual Models. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009. ER 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04839-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04840-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics