Skip to main content

Density Ratio Model

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science
  • 562 Accesses

The problem of comparing two (or more samples) appears in several and diverse applications. The parametric theory resolves the problem by appealing to the well known t-test. To carry out the t-test both samples are assumed to be normally distributed with common unknown variance and unknown means. The two sample t-test enjoys several optimality properties, for instance it is uniformly most powerful unbiased test. Occasionally some (or all) of the needed assumptions fail; for instance, when there exists a group of observations with skewed distribution, then both assumptions of normality and equality of variances do not hold true. Hence, application of the ordinary two-sample t-test is questionable. The problem is usually bypassed after a suitable transformation but the comparison need to be carried out in the transformed scale. Alternatively, we can appeal to the nonparametric theory that approaches the problem of comparing two samples by the so-called Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test (see Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Further Reading

  • Bickel PJ, Klaassen CAJ, Ritov Y, Wellner JA (1998) Efficient and adaptive estimation for semiparametric models. Springer, New York (repr. 1993 original)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fokianos K, Kedem B, Qin J, Short DA (2001) A semiparametric approach to the one-way layout. Technometrics 43:56–64

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fokianos K, Sarrou I, Pashalidis I (2005) A two-sample model for the comparison of radiation doses. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 79:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert PB (2000) Large sample theory of maximum likelihood estimates in semiparametric biased sampling models. Ann Stat 28:151–194

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert PB, Lele SR, Vardi Y (1999) Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric selection bias models with application to AIDS vaccine trials. Biometrika 86:27–43

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gill RD, Vardi Y, Wellner JA (1988) Large sample theory of empirical distributions in biased sampling models. Ann Stat 16:1069–1112

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kedem B, Wolff D, Fokianos K (2004) Statistical comparisons of algorithms. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53:770–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice RL, Pyke R (1979) Logistic disease incidence models and case–control studies. Biometrika 66:403–411

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J (1998) Inferences for case–control data and semiparametric two-sample density ratio models. Biometrika 85:619–630

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Zhang B (1997) A goodness of fit test for the logistic regression model based on case–control data. Biometrika 84:609–618

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Barwick M, Ashbolt R, Dwyer T (2002) Quantifying the change of melanoma incidence by Breslow thickness. Biometrics 58:665–670

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fokianos, K. (2011). Density Ratio Model. In: Lovric, M. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_206

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics