Skip to main content

Completeness in Databases with Maybe-Tuples

  • Conference paper
Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Challenging Perspectives (ER 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5833))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 746 Accesses

Abstract

Some data models use so-called maybe tuples to express the uncertainty, whether or not a tuple belongs to a relation. In order to assess this relation’s quality the corresponding vagueness needs to be taken into account. Current metrics of quality dimensions are not designed to deal with this uncertainty and therefore need to be adapted. One major quality dimension is data completeness. In general, there are two basic ways to distinguish maybe tuples from definite tuples. First, an attribute serving as a maybe indicator (values YES or NO) can be used. Second, tuple probabilities can be specified. In this paper, the notion of data completeness is redefined w.r.t. both concepts. Thus, a more precise estimating of data quality in databases with maybe tuples (e.g. probabilistic databases) is enabled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biskup, J.: Extending the Relational Algebra for Relations with Maybe Tuples and Existential and Universal Null Values. Fundam. Inform. 7(1), 129–150 (1984)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMichiel, L.G.: Resolving Database Incompatibility: An Approach to Performing Relational Operations over Mismatched Domains. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1(4), 485–493 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuhr, N., et al.: A Probabilistic Relational Algebra for the Integration of Information Retrieval and Database Systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 32–66 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinrich, B., et al.: Metrics for Measuring Data Quality - Foundations for an Economic Data Quality Management. In: ICSOFT (ISDM/EHST/DC), pp. 87–94 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Motro, A., Rakov, I.: Estimating the Quality of Databases. In: Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1495, pp. 298–307. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Naumann, F., et al.: Completeness of integrated information sources. Inf. Syst. 29(7), 583–615 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scannapieco, M., Batini, C.: Completeness in the relational model: a comprehensive framework. In: IQ, pp. 333–345 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sen, P., Deshpande, A.: Representing and Querying Correlated Tuples in Probabilistic Databases. In: ICDE, pp. 596–605 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tseng, F.S.-C., et al.: Answering Heterogeneous Database Queries with Degrees of Uncertainty. Distributed and Parallel Databases 1(3), 281–302 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Panse, F., Ritter, N. (2009). Completeness in Databases with Maybe-Tuples. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Challenging Perspectives. ER 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5833. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04946-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04947-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics