Abstract
Reference models provide a set of generally accepted best practices to create efficient processes to be deployed inside organizations. However, a central challenge is to determine how these best practices are implemented in practice. One limitation of existing approaches for measuring compliance is the assumption that the compliance can be determined using the notion of process equivalence. Nonetheless, the use of equivalence algorithms is not adequate since two models can have different structures but one process can still be compliant with the other. This paper presents a new approach and algorithm which allow to measure the compliance of process models with reference models. We evaluate our approach by measuring the compliance of a model currently used by a German passenger airline with the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) reference model and by comparing our results with existing approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Genetic Process Mining: A Basic Approach and its Challenges. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 203–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
APQC, American Productivity & Quality Center, http://www.apqc.org/pcf
Basten, T., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Inheritance of Behavior. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 47(2), 47–145 (2001)
Bergroth, L., Hakonen, H., Raita, T.: A Survey of Longest Common Subsequence Algorithms. In: 7th IEEE Intl. Symposium on String Processing Information Retrieval, pp. 39–48. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)
Buchholz, P., Kemper, P.: Hierarchical Reachability Graph Generation for Petri Nets. Form. Methods Syst. Des. 21(3), 281–315 (2002)
CMMI, Software Engineering Institute, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi
Cook, J.E., He, C., Ma, C.: Measuring Behavioral Correspondence to a Timed Concurrent Model. In: 17th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Software Maintenance, p. 332. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)
Dijkman, R.: Diagnosing Differences between Business Process Models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models. In: 4th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 71–80 (2007)
Teufel, T., Keller, G.: SAP R/3 Process Oriented Implementation: Iterative Process Prototyping. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)
Gerke, K., Tamm, G.: Continuous Quality Improvement of IT Processes based on Reference Models and Process Mining. In: 15th Americas Conf. on Information Systems (2009)
IDS Scheer AG, http://www.ids-scheer.com
Juan, Y.C.: A String Comparison Approach to Process Logic Differences between Process Models. In: 9th Joint Conference on Information Sciences (2006)
Mendling, J., Simon, C.: Business Process Design by View Integration. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 55–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Official Introduction to the ITIL Service Lifecycle. Stationery Office Books, London (2007)
Rozinat, A., Veloso, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Evaluating the Quality of Discovered Process Models. In: Bridewell, W., et al. (eds.) 2nd Intl. Workshop on the Induction of Process Models, Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 45–52 (2008)
SAP AG, http://www.sap.com
Supply-Chain Council, Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, SCOR (2006)
Ladd, A., Curran, T., Keller, G.: SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model. Prentice Hall PTR Enterprise Resource Planning Series, Upper Saddle River (1997)
The IT Governance Institute, COBIT 4.1 (2007)
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Verification of Workflow Nets. In: Azéma, P., Balbo, G. (eds.) ICATPN 1997. LNCS, vol. 1248, pp. 407–426. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business Alignment: Using Process Mining as a Tool for Delta Analysis and Conformance Testing. Requir. Eng. 10(3), 198–211 (2005)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Process Equivalence: Comparing Two Process Models Based on Observed Behavior. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 512–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
van Dongen, B.F., Dikman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
van Glabbeek, R.J., Peter Weijland, W.: Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics. Communications of the ACM 43(3), 555–600 (1996)
Verbeek, H.M.W.: Verification and Enactment of Workflow Management Systems. PhD thesis, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gerke, K., Cardoso, J., Claus, A. (2009). Measuring the Compliance of Processes with Reference Models. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009. OTM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5870. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05148-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05148-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05147-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05148-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)