Abstract
Communication is a fundamental function of life, and it exists in almost all living things: from single-cell bacteria to human beings. Communication, together with competition and cooperation,arethree fundamental processes in nature. Computer scientists are familiar with the study of competition or ’struggle for life’ through Darwin’s evolutionary theory, or even evolutionary computing. They may be equally familiar with the study of cooperation or altruism through the Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) game. However, they are likely to be less familiar with the theory of animal communication. The objective of this article is three-fold: (i) To suggest that the study of animal communication, especially the honesty (reliability) of animal communication, in which some significant advances in behavioral biology have been achieved in the last three decades, should be on the verge to spawn important cross-disciplinary research similar to that generated by the study of cooperation with the PD game. One of the far-reaching advances in the field is marked by the publication of "The Handicap Principle: a Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle" by Zahavi (1997). The ’Handicap’ principle [34][35], which states that communication signals must be costly in some proper way to be reliable (honest), is best elucidated with evolutionary games, e.g., Sir Philip Sidney (SPS) game [23]. Accordingly, we suggest that the Handicap principle may serve as a fundamental paradigm for trust research in computer science. (ii) To suggest to computer scientists that their expertise in modeling computer networks may help behavioral biologists in their study of the reliability of animal communication networks. This is largely due to the historical reason that, until the last decade, animal communication was studied with the dyadic paradigm (sender-receiver) rather than with the network paradigm. (iii) To pose several open questions, the answers to which may bear some refreshing insights to trust research in computer science, especially secure and resilient computing, the semantic web, and social networking. One important thread unifying the three aspects is the evolutionary game theory modeling or its extensions with survival analysis and agreement algorithms [19][20], which offer powerful game models for describing time-, space-, and covariate-dependent frailty (uncertainty and vulnerability) and deception (honesty).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web. J. of Web Semantics 5, 58–71 (2007)
Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981)
Dawkins, R., Krebs, J.R.: Animal Signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B. (eds.) Behavioral Ecology, pp. 282–309. Blackwell, Oxford (1978)
Dawkins, M.S., Guildford, T.: An exaggerated preference for simple neural models of signal evolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 261, 357–360 (1995)
Dietrich, J., Jones, N., Wright, J.: Using social networking and semantic web technology in software engineering. The Journal of Systems and Software 81, 2183–2193 (2008)
Dugatkin, L.A.: The Altruism Equation: Seven Scientists Search for The Origins of Goodness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)
Grafen, A.: Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 473–516 (1990a)
Grafen, A.: Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 517–546 (1990b)
Hamilton, W.D.: The genetic evolution of social behavior (I) & (II). J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964)
Hamilton, W.D., Brown, S.P.: Autumn tree colors as a handicap signal. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268, 1489–1493 (2001)
Hauser, M.D.: The Evolution of Communications. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1998)
Johnstone, R.A.: The evolution of animal signals. In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B. (eds.) Behavioral Ecology, pp. 157–178. Blackwell, Malden (1997)
Kovac, D., Trcěk, D.: Qualitative trust modeling in SOA. J. of Syst. Arch. 55, 255–263 (2009)
Ma, Z.S.: New Approaches to Reliability and Survivability with Survival Analysis, Dynamic Hybrid Fault Models, and Evolutionary Game Theory. PhD Dissertation, University of Idaho (2008)
Ma, Z.S., Krings, A.W.: Dynamic Hybrid Fault Models and their Applications to Wireless Sensor Networks. In: The 11-th ACM/IEEE International Symposium MSWiM, Vancouver, Canada, p. 9 (2008)
Ma, Z.S., Krings, A.W., Sheldon, F.T.: An outline of the three-layer survivability analysis architecture for modeling strategic information warfare. In: Proc. 5th ACM CSIIRW, Oak Ridge National Lab. (2009)
Ma, Z.S., Krings, A.W.: Insect Sensory Systems Inspired Computing and Communications. Ad Hoc Networks 7(4), 742–755 (2009)
Ma, Z.S.: Towards an Extended Evolutionary Game Theory with Survival Analysis and Agreement Algorithms for Modeling Uncertainty, Vulnerability and Deception. LNCS (2009a) (accepted)
Ma, Z.S.: Extended Evolutionary Game Theory Approach to Strategic Information Warfare Research. Journal of Information Warfare (2009b) (accepted)
Ma, Z.S.: Animal Communication Inspired Computing and Communication: A Review for Computer Scientists with a Focus on Reliability of Animal Communication Networks and the Extended Evolutionary Game Theory (2009c) (submitted)
Maŕmol, F.G., Peŕez, G.M.: Security threats scenarios in trust and reputation models for distributed systems. Computers and Security (2009), doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.05.005
Maynard Smith, J.: Honest signaling: Sir Philip Sydney game. Animal Behavior 42, 1034–1035 (1991)
Maynard Smith, J., Harper, D.: Animal Signals, 164 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
McGregor, P.K. (ed.): Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Mitchell, R.W.: A framework for discussing deception. In: Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S. (eds.) Deception: perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit. State University of New York Press (1986)
Vincent, T.L., Brown, J.L.: Evolutionary Game Theory, Natural Selection and Darwinian Dynamics, 382 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Olmedilla, D., Rana, O., Matthews, B., Nejdl, W.: Security and trust issues in semantic grids. In: Proceedings of the Dagsthul Seminar, Semantic Grid, vol. 05271 (2005)
Omar, M., Challal, Y., Bouabdallah, A.: Reliable and fully distributed trust model for mobile ad hoc networks. Computers & Security 28, 199–214 (2009)
Searcy, W.A., Nowicki, S.: The Evolution of Animal Communications. Princeton Univ., Princeton (2005)
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L.: Signalers and receivers in animal communications. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 145–173 (2003)
Silk, J.B., Kaldor, E., Boyd, R.: Cheap talk when interests conflict. Anim. Behav. 59, 423–432 (2000)
ten Cate, C., Rowe, C.: Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22(7), 380–387 (2007)
Trivers, R.L.: The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 189–226 (1971)
Zahavi, A.: Mate selection–a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975)
Zahavi, A.: The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ma, Z.(., Krings, A.W., Hung, CC. (2009). The Handicap Principle for Trust in Computer Security, the Semantic Web and Social Networking. In: Liu, W., Luo, X., Wang, F.L., Lei, J. (eds) Web Information Systems and Mining. WISM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5854. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05250-7_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05250-7_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05249-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05250-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)