Skip to main content

Reasoning about Typicality with Low Complexity Description Logics: The Logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}{\bf T}\)

  • Conference paper
AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5883))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 798 Accesses

Abstract

We present an extension of the low complexity Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}\) for reasoning about prototypical properties and inheritance with exceptions. We add to \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}\) a typicality operator T, which is intended to select the “most normal” instances of a concept. In the resulting logic, called \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}{\bf T}\), the knowledge base may contain subsumption relations of the form “T(C) is subsumed by P”, expressing that typical C-members have the property P. We show that the problem of entailment in \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}{\bf T}\) is in co-NP by proving a small model result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: LTCS-Report LTCS-05-01, Inst. for Theoretical Compute Science, TU Dresden (2005), http://lat.inf.tudresden.de/research/reports.html

  2. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2005, Professional Book Center, pp. 364–369 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Embedding defaults into terminological knowledge representation formalisms. J. Autom. Reasoning 14(1), 149–180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. J. of Automated Reasoning (JAR) 15(1), 41–68 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonatti, P., Faella, M., Sauro, L.: Defeasible inclusions in low-complexity dls: Preliminary notes. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonatti, P.A., Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Description logics with circumscription. In: Proc. of KR, pp. 400–410 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donini, F.M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Description logics of minimal knowledge and negation as failure. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 3(2), 177–225 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. In: KR 2004, pp. 141–151 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: Preferential Description Logics. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4790, pp. 257–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: Reasoning About Typicality in Preferential Description Logics. In: Hölldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 192–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: On Extending Description Logics for Reasoning About Typicality: a First Step. Technical Report 116/09, Dip. di Informatica, Univ. di Torino (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: Prototypical reasoning with low complexity Description Logics: Preliminary results. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5753, pp. 430–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ke, P., Sattler, U.: Next Steps for Description Logics of Minimal Knowledge and Negation as Failure. In: DL 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44(1-2), 167–207 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Straccia, U.: Default inheritance reasoning in hybrid kl-one-style logics. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 676–681 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L. (2009). Reasoning about Typicality with Low Complexity Description Logics: The Logic \(\mathcal{EL}^{+^\bot}{\bf T}\) . In: Serra, R., Cucchiara, R. (eds) AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10290-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10291-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics