Abstract
The recent discovery of the weakest failure detector \({\mathcal{L}}\) for message passing set agreement has renewed the interest in exploring the border between solvable and unsolvable problems in message passing systems. This paper contributes to this research by introducing two novel system models \({\mathcal{M}^\text{anti}}\) and \({\mathcal{M}^\text{sink}}\) with very weak synchrony requirements, where \({\mathcal{L}}\) can be implemented. To the best of our knowledge, they are the first message passing models where set agreement is solvable but consensus is not. We also generalize \({\mathcal{L}}\) by a novel “(n−k)-loneliness” failure detector \({\mathcal{L}}(k)\), which allows to solve k-set agreement but not (k−1)-set agreement. We also present an algorithm that solves k-set agreement with \({\mathcal{L}}(k)\), which is anonymous in that it does not require unique process identifiers. This reveals that \({\mathcal{L}}\) is also the weakest failure detector for anonymous set agreement. Finally, we analyze the relationship between \({\mathcal{L}}(k)\) and other failure detectors, namely the limited scope failure detector \({\mathcal{S}}_{n-k+1}\) and the quorum failure detector Σ.
A brief announcement of this paper was accepted at DISC’09. Martin Biely and Peter Robinson have been supported by the Austrian BM:vit FIT-IT project TRAFT (proj. no. 812205) and the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) project P20529, respectively. Correspondence to: Embedded Computing Systems Group (E182/2), Technische Universität Wien, Treitlstrasse 3, A-1040 Vienna (Austria). Fax: +43(1)58801-18297.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera, M.K., Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Toueg, S.: On implementing Omega with weak reliability and synchrony assumptions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 306–314 (July 2003)
Aguilera, M.K., Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Toueg, S.: Communication-efficient leader election and consensus with limited link synchrony. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2004), St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, pp. 328–337. ACM Press, New York (2004)
Angluin, D.: Local and global properties in networks of processors (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 82–93. ACM, New York (1980)
Attiya, H., Snir, M., Warmuth, M.K.: Computing on an anonymous ring. J. ACM 35(4), 845–875 (1988)
Biely, M., Hutle, M., Penso, L.D., Widder, J.: Relating stabilizing timing assumptions to stabilizing failure detectors regarding solvability and efficiency. In: Masuzawa, T., Tixeuil, S. (eds.) SSS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4838, pp. 4–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Biely, M., Robinson, P., Schmid, U.: Weak synchrony models and failure detectors for message passing k-set agreement. Research Report 51/2009, Technische Universität Wien, Inst. Technische Informatik, 182-2, 1040 Vienna, Austria (2009)
Biely, M., Widder, J.: Optimal message-driven implementation of Omega with mute processes. In: Datta, A.K., Gradinariu, M. (eds.) SSS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4280, pp. 110–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bonnet, F., Raynal, M.: Looking for the weakest failure detector for k-set agreement in message-passing systems: Is Π k the end of the road? In: Guerraoui, R., Petit, F. (eds.) SSS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5873, pp. 129–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Borowsky, E., Gafni, E.: Generalized FLP impossibility result for t-resilient asynchronous computations. In: STOC 1993: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 91–100. ACM, New York (1993)
Chandra, T.D., Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: The weakest failure detector for solving consensus. Journal of the ACM 43(4), 685–722 (1996)
Chandra, T.D., Toueg, S.: Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems. Journal of the ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)
Charron-Bost, B., Schiper, A.: Uniform consensus is harder than consensus. J. Algorithms 51(1), 15–37 (2004); Also published as Tech. Rep. DSC/2000/028, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Chaudhuri, S.: More choices allow more faults: set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems. Inf. Comput. 105(1), 132–158 (1993)
Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R.: Shared Memory vs Message Passing. LPD-REPORT 001, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (2003)
Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Hadzilacos, V., Kouznetsov, P., Toueg, S.: The weakest failure detectors to solve certain fundamental problems in distributed computing. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2004), pp. 338–346. ACM Press, New York (2004)
Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Tielmann, A.: The weakest failure detector for message passing set-agreement. In: Taubenfeld, G. (ed.) DISC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5218, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Dolev, D., Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus. Journal of the ACM 34(1), 77–97 (1987)
Dwork, C., Lynch, N., Stockmeyer, L.: Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony. Journal of the ACM 35(2), 288–323 (1988)
Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)
Fuegger, M., Schmid, U., Fuchs, G., Kempf, G.: Fault-Tolerant Distributed Clock Generation in VLSI Systems-on-Chip. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC-6), pp. 87–96. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
Gafni, E., Kuznetsov, P.: The weakest failure detector for solving k-set agreement. In: 28th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC) (2009)
Guerraoui, R., Herlihy, M., Kouznetsov, P., Lynch, N., Newport, C.: On the weakest failure detector ever. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2007), pp. 235–243. ACM, New York (2007)
Guerraoui, R., Schiper, A.: “gamma-accurate” failure detectors. In: Babaoğlu, Ö., Marzullo, K. (eds.) WDAG 1996. LNCS, vol. 1151, pp. 269–286. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Herlihy, M., Shavit, N.: The asynchronous computability theorem for t-resilient tasks. In: STOC 1993: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 111–120. ACM, New York (1993)
Hutle, M., Malkhi, D., Schmid, U., Zhou, L.: Chasing the weakest system model for implementing omega and consensus. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (to appear, 2009)
Larrea, M., Fernández, A., Arévalo, S.: Optimal implementation of the weakest failure detector for solving consensus. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), Nürnberg, Germany, pp. 52–59 (October 2000)
Malkhi, D., Oprea, F., Zhou, L.: Ω meets paxos: Leader election and stability without eventual timely links. In: Fraigniaud, P. (ed.) DISC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3724, pp. 199–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Mostefaoui, A., Mourgaya, E., Raynal, M.: Asynchronous implementation of failure detectors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2003), San Francisco, CA, June 22–25 (2003)
Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: Unreliable failure detectors with limited scope accuracy and an application to consensus. In: Pandu Rangan, C., Raman, V., Sarukkai, S. (eds.) FST TCS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1738, pp. 329–340. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Mostéfaoui, A., Raynal, M.: k-set agreement with limited accuracy failure detectors. In: PODC 2000: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, pp. 143–152. ACM, New York (2000)
Mostefaoui, A., Raynal, M., Travers, C.: Crash-resilient time-free eventual leadership. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS 2004), pp. 208–217. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)
Raynal, M.: k-anti-Ω. Rump session at PODC 2007 (August 2007)
Robinson, P., Schmid, U.: The Asynchronous Bounded-Cycle Model. In: Kulkarni, S., Schiper, A. (eds.) SSS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5340, pp. 246–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Saks, M., Zaharoglou, F.: Wait-free k-set agreement is impossible: The topology of public knowledge. SIAM J. Comput. 29(5), 1449–1483 (2000)
Schneider, F.B.: Implementing fault-tolerant services using the state machine approach: a tutorial. ACM Comput. Surv. 22(4), 299–319 (1990)
Widder, J., Schmid, U.: The Theta-Model: Achieving synchrony without clocks. Distributed Computing 22(1), 29–47 (2009)
Zielinski, P.: Automatic classification of eventual failure detectors. In: Pelc, A. (ed.) DISC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4731, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Zielinski, P.: Anti-Ω: the weakest failure detector for set agreement. In: PODC 2008: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, pp. 55–64. ACM, New York (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Biely, M., Robinson, P., Schmid, U. (2009). Weak Synchrony Models and Failure Detectors for Message Passing (k-)Set Agreement. In: Abdelzaher, T., Raynal, M., Santoro, N. (eds) Principles of Distributed Systems. OPODIS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5923. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10877-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10877-8_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10876-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10877-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)