Skip to main content

On the Impact of Witness-Based Collusion in Agent Societies

  • Conference paper
Principles of Practice in Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5925))

Abstract

In ways analogous to humans, autonomous agents require trust and reputation concepts in order to identify communities of agents with which to interact reliably. This paper defines a class of attacks called witness-based collusion attacks designed to exploit trust and reputation models. Empirical results demonstrate that unidimensional trust models are vulnerable to witness-based collusion attacks in ways independent multidimensional trust models are not. This paper analyzes the impact of the proportion of witness-based colluding agents on the society. Furthermore, it demonstrates that here is a need for witness interaction trust to detect colluding agents in addition to the need for direct interaction trust to detect malicious agents. By proposing a set of policies, the paper demonstrates how learning agents can decrease the level of encounter risk in a witness-based collusive society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dellarocas, C.: Mechanisms for coping with unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior in online reputation reporting systems. In: ICIS, pp. 520–525 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman, M., Lai, K., Stoica, I., Chuang, J.: Robust incentive techniques for peer-to-peer networks. In: EC 2004, pp. 102–111. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.R.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13(2), 119–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M.: Consumer trust in an internet store. Inf. Technol. and Management 1(1-2), 45–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reid, K., Robin, C.: Smart cheaters do prosper: Defeating trust and reputation systems. In: AAMAS 2009, Budapest, Hunagry, ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh, S.: Formalising trust as a computational concept (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Halberstadt, A.: A computational model of trust and reputation for e-businesses. In: HICSS 2002, Washington, DC, USA, p. 188. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19(1), 1–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In: Fourth Workshop on Deception Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 61–70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24(1), 33–60 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Salehi-Abari, A., White, T.: Towards con-resistant trust models for distributed agent systems. In: IJCAI 2009: Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, CA, USA, pp. 272–277 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Amirali, S.-A., Tony, W.: Witness-based collusion and trust-aware societies. In: SPOSN 2009: the Workshop on Security and Privacy in Online Social Networking (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luke Teacy, W.T., Patel, J., Jennings, N.R., Luck, M.: Coping with inaccurate reputation sources: experimental analysis of a probabilistic trust model. In: AAMAS 2005, pp. 997–1004. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitby, A., Jsang, A., Indulska, J.: Filtering out unfair ratings in bayesian reputation systems. In: Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: A social mechanism of reputation management in electronic communities. In: Klusch, M., Kerschberg, L. (eds.) CIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1860, pp. 154–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: Detecting deception in reputation management. In: AAMAS 2003, pp. 73–80. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Salehi-Abari, A., White, T. (2009). On the Impact of Witness-Based Collusion in Agent Societies. In: Yang, JJ., Yokoo, M., Ito, T., Jin, Z., Scerri, P. (eds) Principles of Practice in Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5925. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11161-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11161-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11160-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11161-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics