Skip to main content

ROC Based Evaluation and Comparison of Classifiers for IVF Implantation Prediction

  • Conference paper
Electronic Healthcare (eHealth 2009)

Abstract

Determination of the best performing classification method for a specific application domain is important for the applicability of machine learning systems. We have compared six classifiers for predicting implantation potentials of IVF embryos. We have constructed an embryo based dataset which represents an imbalanced distribution of positive and negative samples as in most of the medical datasets. Since it is shown that accuracy is not an appropriate measure for imbalanced class distributions, ROC analysis have been used for performance evaluation. Our experimental results reveal that Naive Bayes and Radial Basis Function methods produced significantly better performance with (0.739 ± 0.036) and (0.712 ± 0.036) area under the curve measures respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Steptoe, P.C., Edwards, R.G.: Birth after re-implantation of a human embryo. Lancet 2, 366 (1978)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jurisica, I., Mylopoulos, J., Glasgow, J., Shapiro, H., Casper, R.F.: Case-based reasoning in ivf: Prediction and knowledge mining. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 12, 1–24 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufmann, S.J., Eastauh, J.L., Snowden, S., Smye, S.W., Sharma, V.: The application of neural networks in predictingthe outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 12, 1454–1457 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saith, R., Srinivasan, A., Michie, D., Sargent, I.: Relationships between the developmental potential of human in-vitro fertilization embryos and features describing the embryo, oocyte and follicle. Human Reproduction Update 4(2), 121–134 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Passmore, L., Goodside, J., Hamel, L., Gonzalez, L., Silberstein, T., Trimarchi, J.: Assessing decision tree models for clinical in-vitro fertilization data. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science and Statistics University of Rhode Island (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trimarchi, J.R., Goodside, J., Passmore, L., Silberstein, T., Hamel, L., Gonzalez, L.: Comparing data mining and logistic regression for predicting ivf outcome. Fertil. Steril (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morales, D.A., Bengoetxea, E., Larranaga, B., Garcia, M., Franco, Y., Fresnada, M., Merino, M.: Bayesian classification for the selection of in vitro human embryos using morphological and clinical data. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 90, 104–116 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alpaydin, E.: Introduction to Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maloof, A.M.: Learning when data sets are imbalanced and when costs are unequal and unknown. In: Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Uyar, A., Bener, A., Ciray, H.N., Bahceci, M. (2010). ROC Based Evaluation and Comparison of Classifiers for IVF Implantation Prediction. In: Kostkova, P. (eds) Electronic Healthcare. eHealth 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 27. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11744-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11745-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics