Abstract
Despite the recent emergence of many large-scale networks in different application domains, an important measure that captures a participant’s diversity in the network has been largely neglected in previous studies. Namely, diversity characterizes how diverse a given node connects with its peers. In this paper, we give a comprehensive study of this concept. We first lay out two criteria that capture the semantic meaning of diversity, and then propose a compliant definition which is simple enough to embed the idea. An efficient top-k diversity ranking algorithm is developed for computation on dynamic networks. Experiments on both synthetic and real datasets give interesting results, where individual nodes identified with high diversities are intuitive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barabasi, A.-L., Oltvai, Z.N.: Network biology: Understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5(2), 101–113 (2004)
Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25, 163–177 (2001)
Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester (2006)
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., Faloutsos, C.: On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In: SIGCOMM, pp. 251–262 (1999)
Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(12) (2002)
Hwang, W., Kim, T., Ramanathan, M., Zhang, A.: Bridging centrality: graph mining from element level to group level. In: KDD, pp. 336–344 (2008)
Kuramochi, M., Karypis, G.: Frequent subgraph discovery. In: ICDM, pp. 313–320 (2001)
Lawrence, P., Sergey, B., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University (1998)
Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J.M., Faloutsos, C.: Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In: KDD, pp. 177–187 (2005)
Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1) (1995)
Rosen-Zvi, M., Griffiths, T., Steyvers, M., Smyth, P.: The author-topic model for authors and documents. In: Proceedings of the 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 487–494. AUAI Press (2004)
Stephenson, K., Zelen, M.: Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks 11(1), 1–37 (1989)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)
Yan, X., Han, J.: gSpan: Graph-based substructure pattern mining. In: ICDM, pp. 721–724 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, L. et al. (2010). Mining Diversity on Networks. In: Kitagawa, H., Ishikawa, Y., Li, Q., Watanabe, C. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5981. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12026-8_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12026-8_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12025-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12026-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)