Abstract
Modeling the specific motivations and influences related to an individual’s decision to become involved in insurgent warfare presents its own collection of unique challenges. The difficulty of the problem often necessitates simplifications that, while making the task more manageable, may inadvertently ’smooth away’ critical aspects of the problem. Augmenting the challenge is that research into the motivations of terrorism has found there is not a definitive set of variables that serve as reliable indicators of an individual’s involvement. This paper addresses techniques aimed toward mitigating issues that manifest in the modeling of insurgent recruitment so that these complications do not lessen the viability of models that are used in the prediction and evaluation of terrorist activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, K.: Terrorism and Global Insecurity: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Linton Atlantic Press, Louisville (2009)
Atran, S.: Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. Science, 534–539 (2003)
Bale, J.: Jihadist Cells and “I.E.D.” Capabilities in Europe: Assessing the Present and Future Threat to the West. Unpublished report (2009)
Davis, P., Arquilla, J.: Thinking About Opponent Behavior in Crisis and Conflict: A Generic Model for Group Analysis and Discussion. RAND, Santa Monica (1991)
Gompert, D.: Heads We Win-The cognitive side of counterinsurgency (COIN). RAND, Santa Monica (2007)
Hoffman, B.: The ‘Cult of the Insurgent’: Its Tactical and Strategic Implications. Australian Journal of International Affairs 61, 312–329 (2007)
Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, UK (2001)
Horgan, J.: The psychology of terrorism. Routledege Taylor & Francis Group, London (2007)
Jackson, B., Baker, J., Chalk, P., Cragin, K., Parachini, J., Trujillo, H.: Aptitude for Destruction: Organizational Learning in Terrorist Groups and Its Implications for Combating Terrorism v. 1. RAND, Santa Monica (2005)
Kilcullen, D.: Countering Global Insurgency. Journal of Strategic Studies 28(4), 597–617 (2005)
McCormick, G.: Terrorist Decision Making. Annual Review of Political Science 6(6), 473–507 (2003)
Ross, J.: A Model of the Psychological Causes of Oppositional Political Terrorism Peace and Conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology 2(2), 129–141 (1996)
Sageman, M.: Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2007)
Sciolino, E., Schmitt, E.: A Not Very Private Feud Over Terrorism. New York Times, June 8 (2008)
Snodgrass, T.: Is counterinsurgency a viable strategy for America? American Thinker, October 4 (2009)
Zacharias, G., Macmillan, J., Van Hemel, S.: National Academies Press, Washington (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Briscoe, E., Trewhitt, E., Weiss, L., Whitaker, E. (2010). Mitigating Issues Related to the Modeling of Insurgent Recruitment. In: Chai, SK., Salerno, J.J., Mabry, P.L. (eds) Advances in Social Computing. SBP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12079-4_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12079-4_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12078-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12079-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)