Abstract
More and more evidence indicates that flash storage is a potential substitute for magnetic disk in the foreseeable future. Due to the high-speed random reads, flash storage could improve the performance of DBMS significantly in OLTP applications. However, previous research has shown that small-to-moderate random overwrites on flash are particularly expensive, which implies that the conventional DBMS is not ready to run on the flash storage. In this paper, we propose the design of a variant of B+ tree for flash storage, namely the Update-Migration B+ tree. In the UM-B+ tree, small quantity of updates will be migrated, rather than being executed directly, to its parent node in the form of update records when a dirty node is evicted from main memory. Further accesses to the child node will cause the update records stored in the parent node to be executed when reading the child node from the permanent storage (flash). We propose the detailed structure and operations of UM-B+ tree. We also discuss expanding the UM-B+ tree to the transaction system based on the Aries/IM. Experiments confirm that our proposed UM-B+ tree significantly reduces the random overwrites of B+ tree in a typical OLTP workloads, therefore securing a significant performance improvement on flash storage.
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 60803003, 60970124) and by Chang-Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Grant (IRT0652) at Zhejiang University.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gray, J., Fitzgerald, B.: Flash disk opportunity for sever applications. ACM Queue 6(4), 18–23 (2008)
Lai, S.K.: Flash memories: Successes and challenges. IBM Journal of Research and Developmen 52(4-5), 529–535 (2008)
Lee, S.W., Moon, B.: Design of flash-based dbms: an in-page logging approach. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 55–66 (2007)
Bouganim, L., Jónsson, B.T., Bonnet, P.: uFLIP: Understanding Flash IO Patterns. In: CIDR (2009)
Wu, C.-H., Chang, L.-P., Kuo, T.-W.: An Efficient B-Tree Layer for Flash-Memory Storage Systems. In: Chen, J., Hong, S. (eds.) RTCSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2968, pp. 409–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Lee, H.-S., Park, S., Song, H.-J., Lee, D.-H.: An Efficient Buffer Management Scheme for Implementing a B-Tree on NAND Flash memory. In: Lee, Y.-H., Kim, H.-N., Kim, J., Park, Y.W., Yang, L.T., Kim, S.W. (eds.) ICESS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4523, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Xiang, X., Yue, L., Liu, Z., Wei, P.: A reliable B-tree implementation over flash memory. In: SAC, pp. 1487–1491 (2008)
Li, Y., He, B., Luo, Q., Yi, K.: Tree Indexing on Flash Disks. In: ICDE, pp. 1303–1306 (2009)
Na, G.-J., Moon, B., Lee, S.-W.: In-Page Logging B-Tree for Flash Memory. In: DASFAA, pp. 755–758 (2009)
Agrawal, D., Ganesan, D., Sitaraman, R., Diao, Y., Singh, S.: Lazy-Adaptive Tree: An Optimized Index Structure for Flash Devices. PVLDB 2(1), 361–372 (2009)
O’Neil, P.E., Cheng, E., Gawlick, D., O’Neil, E.J.: The Log-Structured Merge-Tree (LSM-Tree). Acta Inf. 33(4), 351–385 (1996)
Mohan, C.: Concurrency Control and Recovery Methods for B+-Tree Indexes: ARIES/KVL and ARIES/IM. In: Performance of Concurrency Control Mechanisms in Centralized Database Systems, pp. 248–306 (1996)
Kornacker, M., Mohan, C., Hellerstein, J.M.: Concurrency and Recovery in Generalized Search Trees. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 67–72 (1997)
Mohan, C., Levine, F.E.: ARIES/IM: An Efficient and High Concurrency Index Management Method Using Write-Ahead Logging. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 371–380 (1992)
Mohan, C., Haderle, D.J., Lindsay, B.G., Pirahesh, H., Schwarz, P.M.: ARIES: A Transaction Recovery Method Supporting Fine-Granularity Locking and Partial Rollbacks Using Write-Ahead Logging. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 17(1), 94–162 (1992)
Lehman, P., Yao, S.: Efficient locking for concurrent operationson B-trees. ACM Trans Database Sys. 6(4), 650–670 (1981)
Agrawal, N., Prabhakaran, V., Wobber, T., Davis, J.D., Manasse, M.S., Panigrahy, R.: Design Tradeoffs for SSD Performance. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pp. 57–70 (2008)
Sagiv, Y.: Concurrent Operations on B-Trees with Overtaking. In: PODS, pp. 28–37 (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xu, C., Shou, L., Chen, G., Yan, C., Hu, T. (2010). Update Migration: An Efficient B+ Tree for Flash Storage. In: Kitagawa, H., Ishikawa, Y., Li, Q., Watanabe, C. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12098-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12098-5_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12097-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12098-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)