Skip to main content

Temporal Shingling for Version Identification in Web Archives

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5993))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Building and preserving archives of the evolving Web has been an important problem in research. Given the huge volume of content that is added or updated daily, identifying the right versions of pages to store in the archive is an important building block of any large-scale archival system. This paper presents temporal shingling, an extension of the well-established shingling technique for measuring how similar two snapshots of a page are. This novel method considers the lifespan of shingles to differentiate between important updates that should be archived and transient changes that may be ignored. Extensive experiments demonstrate the tradeoff between archive size and version coverage, and show that the novel method yields better archive coverage at smaller sizes than existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand, A., et al.: EverLast: a distributed architecture for preserving the web. In: JCDL, pp. 331–340 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brin, S., Davis, J., Garcia-Molina, H.: Copy detection mechanisms for digital documents. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 398–409 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broder, A.Z.: Identifying and filtering near-duplicate documents. In: Giancarlo, R., Sankoff, D. (eds.) CPM 2000. LNCS, vol. 1848, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Broder, A.Z., Glassman, S.C., Manasse, M.S., Zweig, G.: Syntactic clustering of the web. Computer Networks 29(8-13), 1157–1166 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charikar, M.: Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. In: STOC, pp. 380–388 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H.: Effective page refresh policies for web crawlers. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 28(4), 390–426 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H.: Estimating frequency of change. ACM Trans. Internet Techn. 3(3), 256–290 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chowdhury, A., et al.: Collection statistics for fast duplicate document detection. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20(2), 171–191 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conrad, J.G., et al.: Online duplicate document detection: signature reliability in a dynamic retrieval environment. In: CIKM, pp. 443–452 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henzinger, M.R.: Finding near-duplicate web pages: a large-scale evaluation of algorithms. In: SIGIR, pp. 284–291 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoad, T.C., Zobel, J.: Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents. JASIST 54(3), 203–215 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolcz, A., Chowdhury, A., Alspector, J.: Improved robustness of signature-based near-replica detection via lexicon randomization. In: KDD, pp. 605–610 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manber, U.: Finding similar files in a large file system. In: USENIX Winter, pp. 1–10 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manku, G.S., Jain, A., Sarma, A.D.: Detecting near-duplicates for web crawling. In: WWW, pp. 141–150 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olston, C., Pandey, S.: Recrawl scheduling based on information longevity. In: WWW, pp. 437–446 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Theobald, M., Siddharth, J., Paepcke, A.: SpotSigs: robust and efficient near duplicate detection in large web collections. In: SIGIR, pp. 563–570 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schenkel, R. (2010). Temporal Shingling for Version Identification in Web Archives. In: Gurrin, C., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12274-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12275-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics